Todd Combs of Castle Point Capital Joins Berkshire Hathaway as Investment Manager

Warren Buffett just announced that Todd Combs of hedge fund Castle Point Capital will be joining Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) as an investment manager at the end of the year. Buffett and Charlie Munger have been tracking Combs for three years and Combs has been running his hedge fund for the past five years.

We'd hypothesize that in the intermediate term, Combs has been brought on as a replacement for Lou Simpson since Combs is said to take control of part of Berkshire's investment portfolio. Simpson, who manages the investments for Berkshire's subsidiary, GEICO, is set to retire at the end of 2010 (the same time when Combs is set to start). On the notion that Combs could manage all of Berkshire's investments, Buffett said, "He’s got the best chance of being the successor, but if we find the right guy or gal, we’d take that person, too."

In the past, many have questioned Berkshire Hathaway's succession plans and this year there has been much talk of Li Lu joining as an investment manager. However, Buffett has just revealed that Lu will be staying with his own fund. Buffett also emphasized that Berkshire's succession will include one person handling the CEO role, and then multiple individuals could still act as investment managers in a multi-pronged approach.

Why Todd Combs?

This is the question many people are asking as he doesn't seem to be particularly well-known. Here are some potential reasons for the hire:

First, his focus on financials. Given the recent financial crisis, Combs' familiarity with these companies and niche focus on the sector gives him an advantage. In an increasingly complex financial world (derivatives, etc), Combs' expertise will come in handy considering Berkshire owns very large stakes in financials including: Wells Fargo (WFC), American Express (AXP), US Bancorp (USB), Moody's (MCO), and M&T Bank (MTB).

Second, his risk management skills. Buffett apparently described Combs' performance during the crisis as, "pretty good." According to Bloomberg, Castle Point returned +6.2% in 2009, -5.7% in 2008, +19% in 2007, and +13.6% in 2006. In Berkshire's 2007 shareholder letter, Buffett discussed the topic of hiring investment managers. In it, he said that this person needs to be, "genetically programmed to recognize and avoid risk, including those never before encountered." Given this stringent requirement, it's obvious that Buffett and company feel Combs possesses a risk management skill-set that is beyond satisfactory. (And speaking of risk, Buffett recently talked about his worst trade).

Third, his personality blends with Berkshire's culture. According to the New York Times, Buffett said that, "He’s always been enamored with Berkshire. I know he’ll be good, but he’s the right type of guy. We don’t want someone who’s trying to figure out if they can make $100 million with us, or $200 million with the next guy." And, this ties somewhat into the next reason.

Fourth, his age. Given the fact that Berkshire's leading men Warren Buffett, Charlie Munger, and Lou Simpson are getting older, Berkshire wants to bring in younger talent that can add longevity to the company. At the young age of 39, Combs can slide into Berkshire's organization and stay there for many decades, just as Buffett has. And, based on his personality, it appears that Combs is in it for the long haul. Combs received his degree in finance and multinational business operations from Florida State University. He has experience working for Florida's comptroller as well as Progressive Insurance.

Castle Point Capital's Portfolio

Given Berkshire's stamp of approval, it's only appropriate to look under the hood at Todd Combs' hedge fund to see what he's invested in. The following were Castle Point's long equity holdings as of June 30th, 2010 according to their most recent 13F filing with the SEC. The new disclosures reflecting their Q3 portfolio will be released in the middle of November.

Keep in mind that you can see what Berkshire Hathaway and prominent hedge funds are investing in via our newsletter, Hedge Fund Wisdom. But for the time being, here's Castle Point's $279 million in reported assets:

New Positions
CIT Group (CIT)
Broadridge Financial (BR)
Leucadia (LUK)
Hartford Financial (HIG)
PNC Financial (PNC)
Wells Fargo (WFC)
Chatham Lodging (CLDT)

Increased Positions
Blackrock (BLK): Increased by 78.5%
Aercap (AER): Increased by 78%
Mastercard (MA): Increased by 70%
State Street (STT): Increased by 60%
Genworth Financial (GNW): Increased by 53%
Charles Schwab (SCHW): Increased by 43%
Annaly Capital (NLY): Increased by 43%
Western Union (WU): Increased by 36%
US Bancorp (USB): Increased by 27.5%
Chubb (CB): Increased by 27.5%

Reduced Positions
JPMorgan Chase (JPM): Reduced by 39%
MB Financial (MBFI): Reduced by 21.5%
Goldman Sachs (GS): Reduced by 18.4%

Sold Out of Completely
Assurant (AIZ)
Signature Bank (SBNY)
Reinsurance Group America (RGA)
TD Ameritrade (AMTD)
First Citizens Bancshares (FCNCA)
Two Harbors Investment (TWO)

Top 25 Positions

1. US Bancorp (USB): 8.2% of reported assets
2. Mastercard (MA): 7.3%
3. State Street (STT): 6.8%
4. Western Union (WU): 6.5%
5. CME Group (CME): 5.1%
6. Renaissance Re (RNR): 5.1%
7. Pennymac Mortgage (PMAC): 4.6%
8. Chubb (CB): 4.6%
9. Starwood Property Trust (STWD): 4.5%
10. Annaly Capital Management (NLY): 4.4%
11. CIT Group (CIT): 4.3%
12. Progressive (PGR): 4.1%
13. JPMorgan Chase (JPM): 4.0%
14. Goldman Sachs (GS): 3.8%
15. Charles Schwab (SCHW): 3.6%
16. Broadridge Financial (BR): 3.5%
17. Aercap Holdings (AER): 3.4%
18. MB Financial (MBFI): 3.4%
19. Genworth Financial (GNW): 2.9%
20. United America Indemnity: 1.9%
21. Blackrock (BLK): 1.8%
22. Leucadia National (LUK): 1.8%
23. Hartford Financial (HIG): 1.6%
24. PNC Financial (PNC): 0.8%
25. First Financial (FFBC): 0.8%

As you can see, Castle Point's portfolio is very financial-laden. And, they share the same large position in US Bancorp (USB) as Berkshire Hathaway. We'd also point out Combs' preference for payment processors & money transfer services such as Mastercard (MA) and Western Union (WU). These types of companies have been long favored by hedge funds we track. The last takeaway here is that he runs a somewhat concentrated portfolio as well.

So, at least one of Berkshire's future investment managers seems to be in place. Li Lu appears to be out of the running. The question that remains is, will there be more managers added? Only time will tell. You can view Buffett's past comments on succession plans here as well as a video that examines potential Berkshire successors here.

For more on Berkshire's new hire, Carol Loomis at Fortune penned an article here.

Stop Losses

I want to point out 3 charts that I've monitored/been monitoring. Each chart points out a separate staple of technical analysis. Yet, at the same time, they all illustrate the use of a stop loss and how you can identify where to place your stop on your holdings.

1.) Support/Resistance. These are areas on the chart that you can visibly see a stock either having trouble breaking through at, or finding support at. These are visual representations of the price action in the underlying stock. In this specific example, I want to focus on how you can use support/resistance to your advantage in terms of either placing stop losses or price targets. In this case, US Bank (USB) was considered to be a conservative bank. But, since they are still a bank, they are still a good house in a bad neighborhood. The dividend is nice and all, but the chart gave me a clear signal after it could not find support at a level of past support. I thus placed my stoploss right below this area of support. So, if the support failed to hold, I knew the stock would be headed lower and I would need to get out. And, that's exactly how it played out. On the chart, you can see a strong area of past support around $28. So, I placed my stop below that and got stopped out accordingly once it broke down past support. This stop loss saved me from the ensuing 25% drop USB experienced. This is the perfect example as to why you should have a stoploss on all your holdings. (Oh, and for those curious, I was only in USB to begin with because I was employing a buy-write strategy. They have a solid dividend, so I was pocketing the dividend (5%+) and then writing covered calls on the name every month to pocket more money since the stock essentially traded sideways for a long time).

(click to enlarge)

2. Trendline. Mastercard (MA) is sitting on a longer term support line right now. Once again, the quote of the week has been "The trend is your friend." Once the trend ends, get the hell out. So, take all the lows of the trend and connect the dots making your trend line. If the stock breaks below the trendline, it is most likely going lower and you need to get out. Place your stop loss accordingly. So, for instance, in MA, I would be buying this dip as it is on longer term support from the trendline. Secondly, it has filled the gap (but that's a whole nother topic). Then, place your stop just below the trend line. If it breaks, its going lower. For the graph below, focus on the green trendline I've drawn in.

(click to enlarge)

3. Head and Shoulders Pattern. This pattern pops up all over charts all the time. And, if you can spot it, you can benefit from it as this pattern is typically bearish. For this example, I want to focus on Suncor (SU). I'm actually very bullish on this name for the long term. But, for now, I'm using the technical analysis to my advantage. I've spotted a head and shoulders in this name and it could potentially trade much lower (especially if oil prices continue their decline). I've highlighted the two shoulders and the head with green circles. As you can see, the head is the peak of the formation and the shoulders are on either side, at the same price level. Then, the bottom of the formation is accompanied by a 'neckline' where the two shoulders form their bases. For SU, this neckline is at $55 and is the make of break point. This level represents support as the stock has previously bounced twice at that level. So, if it breaks the level to the downside, the stock could trade much lower. Now, for all intensive purposes, this stock could just continue to trade higher and not complete the H+S pattern. But, the point is that once you identify the neckline, you've identified your stop loss. For SU, you'd place a stop loss below $55 and call it good. You can get short anywhere below that level. Or, if SU holds that level, then you can get long. For now, the pattern is an *anticipatory* head and shoulders. It hasn't actually completed the pattern so I am technically jumping the gun here. If it trades down to $55 and then breaks the neckline, then it will be complete. Again, for all I know, this name could continue to march higher. But, its just something good to consider when managing your holdings. Also note that this chart makes uses of support/resistance as well (the neckline).

(click to enlarge)

Wow...

So, fresh off my post about owning MA and V as your play on financials, I receive this chart... what timing! Barry Ritholtz over at Big Picture has a nice graph (seen above) of banks that have accessed the fed's discount window. As you can see, this year has been record setting to say the least in terms of banks needing help. So, what's next? Implosion? Just another reminder as to why I want to avoid the financials in general and stick to best of breed in the space if you really feel the need to be in there. Some of these companies' balance sheets are giant mysteries, and Lehman (LEH) scares the crap out of me right now with all their level 3 assets or whatever. Click on the graph to enlarge it and get an up close and personal view of how "well-run" our banks are at the moment.

Why the only "financials" you need to own are Mastercard (MA) and Visa (V)

I love it when the media (especially those yaks on cnbc) always ask "Is now the time to buy the financials?!?!" Personally, I steer clear from most of them, except for a revered few. And, they don't even really count as true 'financials.' I'm talking about Mastercard (MA) and Visa (V). I want to preface this by saying that by no means do I recommend jumping into these names right now at these levels. They've had massive runs and undoubtedly are due for pullbacks. But, I just want to put it on your radar for when they eventually do pull back. I've been selling into the strength and only have a little bit of each left and am dying for a pullback to load up on these names. I'm starting to feel empty inside because I can't have full positions in these dominant companies haha.

(Side Note: Now, don't get me wrong, there are 2 ACTUAL financials that I like, US Bank (USB) and Goldman Sachs (GS). USB because of the strong 5% dividend and solid dividend growth, as well as a pretty cautious management team. They seem to have weathered the majority of the storm in terms of the credit crisis/housing woes, and the stock mainly trades sideways. So, I just pocket the dividend and write some covered calls on that badboy to create some nice cashflow. Treat this name almost like a CD or a high yield savings account (but higher yielding). GS, on the other hand, is by far the best of breed investment bank and they get dragged through the mud with the other banks due to guilt by association. In the long run, look for them to distance themselves from the pack and truly outperform. Look to really load up on shares around $160 or even $150 if it trades that low. GS and USB are the only "true" financials I touch with a ten foot pole.)

The main thing that prompted me to post about MA and V has been SunTrust's analyst coverage of the names. Normally, I don't pay much attention to analyst estimates because half the time the analysts are wrong. But, I pay attention to these calls solely because time and time again, SunTrust has been ahead of the pack (and rightly so) in terms of realizing the true revenue that MA and V can grow. Notable Calls has been right on the money by flagging this for their readers. SunTrust now has a street high estimate for MA 2008 and 2009 EPS. Last week, SunTrust raised fical 2008, 2009, and 2010 EPS estimates for V. For V, they raise 2008 estimates from $2.04 to $2.11, 2009 estimates from $2.69 to $2.96, and 2010 estimates from $3.55 to $3.82. As you can see, these are pretty substantial boosts. Then they come right back this week and raise MA's estimates even higher. They boosted MA's 2008 estimates from $8.68 to $8.94 and 2009 estimates from $11.08 to $12.17. Once again, a pretty notable increase. SunTrust suggests that MA could see sustainable EPS growth of at least 20%, which is huge. The overall belief is that MA and V are seeing pricing power in their industry niche of payment processing with no credit risk. They have operating leverage (and are continuing to reduce operating costs) and are seeing massive volume growth. Voila - my investment thesis all along. Suntrust has an argument for those who say MA and V are rich in valuation now: They believe that this is due to the fact that analyst estimates are simply too low and flat out unrealistic.

This reminds me of the exact situation that has been occurring in the fertilizer segment of the agriculture trade. Analysts simply have too low of estimates and these companies are actually trading at much cheaper multiples than we think. 6 months later in the fertilizer game and analysts are STILL playing catch-up. Now, I don't think MA and V are seeing the kind of secular growth explosion that MOS or POT are obviously; but, at the same time, I definitely agree that analyst estimates are too low on MA and V and there is a secular trend building. SunTrust is the only analyst I'll follow on this group simply because they are leading the pack of analysts right now and until the others play catch-up, SunTrust is the only bank out there who "gets it." Through my time in the markets, I've found that certain analysts in each sector are just flat out better than others (surprise, surprise), and you've got to find those analysts and only listen to them. Listening to the others is just a truckload of garbage and noise. So, SunTrust is way ahead of the game here and look for others to follow suit once they crunch the numbers and take a look at what is really happening in the world of global payment processing and realize that their estimates are way too low.

The phrase "global payment processing" is all you really need to know about these companies. They are global stories and most of the growth is occurring away from American shores. Despite an economic slowdown/recession in America, MA and V continue to see huge revenue growth due to international consumers' willingness to use plastic rather than cash. The slowdown in spending from American consumers is not even a chink in the armor of these guys. Think of the rest of the globe as Americans 10 years ago. Eventually, everyone gets used to using debit/credit cards and starts carrying less cash. I can't underscore this point enough. The international opportunity for these names is huge. If they can get consumers in other countries to use their cards even HALF as much as American consumers, they will see record numbers.

Plain and simple, MA and V are payment processors who bear ZERO credit risk. If you want some credit risk, you can always go with some American Express (AXP), if that's your cup of tea. I can see the appeal there, and so does Blue Ridge Capital (seeing as they really loaded up on shares of AXP last quarter). But, I prefer MA and V due to the sheer volume of cards they have in consumers' hands worldwide. I want to stress again that I usually do not pay a ton of attention to individual analyst estimates. But, when you see a firm come out with street-high estimates, constantly leading the pack of analysts, it gets your attention. I think these guys are right on the money and that's why I wanted to point it out. They've been talking my investment thesis in these processors all along. Oh, and did I mention that Lone Pine Capital has a pretty hefty position in MA and V, as detailed here.

Disclosure - long MA and V at the time of writing, but have been selling into strength lately. Looking for a pullback of any size to really begin to add. Keep these names on your radar.