Tuesday, August 31, 2010

Introducing Hedge Fund Wisdom By Market Folly: A Quarterly Newsletter

Today we're very pleased to announce the first issue of Hedge Fund Wisdom, a brand new quarterly newsletter by Market Folly in collaboration with other professional hedge fund analysts/investors. Want to know what top managers have been buying and selling? Our in-depth 75 page issue is your complete guide.

Hedge Fund Wisdom by Market Folly includes the following:

- Complete portfolio updates on 20 of the most prominent hedge funds including what they bought, what they sold, and by how much

- Commentary and analysis of each fund's moves

- Consensus stocks bought & sold among the hedge funds covered

- In-depth analysis of 3 stocks hedge funds were buying in the second quarter. We take you inside the head of a hedge fund manager to examine the investment thesis, upside & downside, potential catalysts, market valuation, contrarian viewpoint, and more.


Managers covered in this inaugural issue of Hedge Fund Wisdom by Market Folly include:

Seth Klarman (Baupost Group)
Warren Buffett (Berkshire Hathaway)
David Einhorn (Greenlight Capital)
Stephen Mandel (Lone Pine Capital)
David Tepper (Appaloosa Management)
Bill Ackman (Pershing Square Capital Management)
Bruce Berkowitz (Fairholme Capital)
Chase Coleman (Tiger Global Management)
John Burbank (Passport Capital)
Leon Cooperman (Omega Advisors)
Dan Loeb (Third Point)
John Griffin (Blue Ridge Capital)
John Paulson (Paulson & Co)
Lee Ainslie (Maverick Capital)
Julian Robertson (Tiger Management)
George Soros (Soros Fund Management)
Roberto Mignone (Bridger Management)
Chris Shumway (Shumway Capital Partners)
Richard Perry (Perry Capital)
Larry Robbins (Glenview Capital)

To celebrate our launch, take advantage of our special introductory offer! Choose one of the following options to pay via PayPal or credit card:

HFW Member ~ Annual (most popular choice! lock in additional savings) @ $199/year









HFW Member - Quarterly (rates going up soon, limited time offer) @ $60/quarter






*To pay by credit card, look for the "No PayPal account? Pay using your credit or debit card" note at the bottom of the PayPal page you will be redirected to.

Also, you can enter your email address below to receive a free sample:










Get a Free Sample!

















Tuesday, August 24, 2010

Last Chance For Substantial Discount to the Value Investing Congress

Just a reminder that this is your last chance to benefit from substantial savings for the Value Investing Congress. The event takes place on October 12th & 13th in New York City. Market Folly readers can save $1,700 with discount code N10MF6. Register in the next six days before the price increases by $400. Click here to receive the discount.

Also if you haven't heard, Bill Ackman of Pershing Square Capital Management has confirmed he will also be presenting investment ideas at the event. Here's the full list of hedge fund managers speaking:

- John Burbank (Passport Capital): Has returned 23.6% annualized. Predicted & profited from the subprime crisis.

- David Einhorn (Greenlight Capital): Has returned 22% annualized. Predicted the demise of Lehman Brothers & profited from it.

- Kyle Bass (Hayman Capital): Predicted both the subprime crisis as well as sovereign defaults.

- Bill Ackman (Pershing Square): Bought shares of General Growth Properties for around $0.40 and the stock now trades for more than $13 per share.

- Lee Ainslie (Maverick Capital): At the end of 2009, his hedge fund had returned 14.2% annualized since 1995.

Other speakers include Mohnish Pabrai, J. Carlo Cannell, Zeke Ashton, and Whitney Tilson.

Take advantage of the substantial discount while it lasts. The price increases in six days, so receive your discount to the Value Investing Congress.


Seth Klarman ~ Quote of the Week

For Market Folly's quote of the week this time around, we turn again to legendary investor Seth Klarman. To put this quotation in context, keep in mind that Klarman often holds a large amount of cash on hand for when opportunities arise. Below, he touches on the battle between human emotion and rational thinking:

"The overwhelming majority of people are comfortable with consensus, but successful investors tend to have a contrarian bent. Successful investors like stocks better when they’re going down. When you go to a department store or a supermarket, you like to buy merchandise on sale, but it doesn’t work that way in the stock market. In the stock market, people panic when stocks are going down, so they like them less when they should like them more. When prices go down, you shouldn’t panic, but it’s hard to control your emotions when you’re overextended, when you see your net worth drop in half and you worry that you won’t have enough money to pay for your kids’ college."

~ Seth Klarman

Since he brings up the notion of consensus views and so we want to make sure everyone had a chance to read this great piece outlining consensus versus variant perceptions in today's market. For more from the Baupost Group manager, check out Seth Klarman's recommended reading list as well as an in-depth profile of Klarman.


Monday, August 23, 2010

Lone Pine Capital Adds to Equinix (EQIX), Starts Dick's Sporting Goods (DKS) Stake

Stephen Mandel's hedge fund Lone Pine Capital after the market close filed two separate 13G's with the SEC, both which reflect portfolio activity as of August 12th, 2010. Firstly, Lone Pine Capital has disclosed a 5.8% ownership stake in Equinix (EQIX) with 2,664,251 shares. As you'll see in our impending second quarter hedge fund update, Lone Pine started Equinix (EQIX) as a brand new position in Q2 and they owned 1,731,835 shares as of June 30th, 2010. In the month and a half that has elapsed since then, Lone Pine has increased its stake by almost 54%, adding 932,416 more shares. This portfolio activity comes after we saw Lone Pine add to its stake in Lincare Holdings (LNCR).

Secondly, Mandel's hedge fund has also disclosed a 5.6% ownership stake in Dick's Sporting Goods (DKS) with 5,054,663 shares. This is a brand new position for the hedge fund. Lone Pine did not show a position in DKS as of June 30th, which means they could have built this position in Dick's Sporting Goods anytime over the past month and a half. However, they've obviously done some recent buying that took them over the regulatory threshold which required them to file the 13G with the SEC.

Taken from Google Finance, Equinix "provides global network neutral data center services. The Company operates 49 International Business Exchange (IBX) centers, or IBX data centers, across 18 markets in North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific where customers directly interconnect with a networked ecosystem of partners and customers."

Dick's Sporting Goods is "a sporting goods retailer offering a range of brand name sporting goods equipment, apparel, and footwear in a specialty store environment. As of January 30, 2010, the Company operated 419 Dick’s Sporting Goods stores in 40 states and 91 Golf Galaxy stores in 31 states."

Click here to scroll through Lone Pine's investments that we've continuously updated.


Wednesday, August 18, 2010

Lesson on 13F's From Whitney Tilson & an Update on Their InterOil Short Position

Whitney Tilson, hedge fund manager of T2 Partners recently commented on the latest round of SEC 13F filings and how people tend to misread them. We thought this was an excellent time to continue our impromptu lessons on 13F filings that we started yesterday. Today's topics? Discerning net exposures in positions and distinguishing when ownership of common stock is not necessarily a long position. The following is printed with permission from Mr. Tilson regarding message board participants improperly reading his firm's 13F:

"It says a lot about who owns InterOil when folks on the company’s message boards are saying we’ve gone long the stock based on our 13-F. HA! This is a very large bearish bet for us. A lot of people make this mistake when reading 13-Fs: managers often own puts (which are also disclosed in the 13-F) or are short a stock (which isn’t disclosed) and then own a small offsetting long position to make it easy to trade around it.

In our case, our 13F shows that as of 6/30, we owned 1,623 put contracts (representing 162,300 shares of stock) on IOC and, in addition, were long a mere 10,400 shares. Puts can be very hard to trade, so we just bought more puts than we wanted and offset the extra amount by buying some stock, resulting in the desired net exposure. Then, if we want to increase or decrease our bearish bet, we can simply buy or sell the stock."

This just reinforces the need for investors to *read* 13F filings carefully. In particular, make sure to glance at the right-hand columns on the filing to distinguish whether a position is a stock option (put or call) rather than just common stock. Just yesterday, Bloomberg omitted options positions from an article on 13F analysis. And today, we see that message board readers have either overlooked the options portion of T2's filing or misinterpreted their common stock position.

T2's actions of buying puts and then buying a small slice of common stock illustrate an important example of liquidity and having the ability to trade around a position. This becomes even more important in stocks that are heavily shorted and can swing wildly with volatility. So if a hedge fund owns multiple securities of the same company, you have to assess the values of each individual security to ultimately determine if it is a bullish or bearish wager. And in T2 Partners' case, they own way more puts than common stock, resulting in an obvious bearish bet.

Tilson also updated us on T2 Partners' short position in IOC. We've detailed this stake numerous times in the past as it's rare you see fund managers talk openly about their short positions. As such, we've taken the opportunity below to highlight Tilson's recent thoughts on InterOil:

"We added to our bearish bet (yesterday), as InterOil reported Q2 earnings yesterday that reinforced our investment thesis. The earnings and EBITDA (driven by the refinery operation) are irrelevant for a company that has a $2.9 BILLION (not a typo) market cap; what really matters if whether there is, in fact, the Sierra Madre of oil and gas in the areas being explored by InterOil and, if so, whether they have the cash to find it, develop it commercially, etc.

Re: the former, there continues to be no proven or even probable reserves – just more hype and gibberish like this from the earnings release:

The Antelope 2 horizontal well confirmed a higher condensate-to-natural gas ratio of 20.4 barrels per million cubic feet of natural gas, 27% higher than observed at the top of the reservoir. The horizontal well also demonstrated dolomitization and higher porosity deeper in the reservoir than previously modeled.

And re. the cash, this company is going to hit the wall soon. Over the past four quarters, net income is -$1.3 million and free cash flow is -$181.9 million (cash from operating activities minus “expenditure on oil and gas properties” and “expenditure on plant and equipment, net of disposals”, broken down as follows:

Q3 09: -$48.6 million
Q4 09: -$40.7 million
Q1 10: -$28.5 million
Q2 10: -$64.1 million
TOTAL: $181.9 million)

So with no profits to fund such massively negative cash flows, how is InterOil doing it? Answer #1: Burning through cash (unrestricted cash has declined from $96.4 million a year ago to $31.7 million today). Answer #2: Taking on debt (the working capital facility – short-term debt – is up from $4.0 million a year ago to $57.7 million today, partly offset by a $9 million decline in a secured loan). Answer #3: Issuing stock and conversion of debt ($12.8 million over the past 12 months), resulting in the diluted share count rising 16.1%. Answer #4: Misc. other stuff (“Proceeds from IPI cash calls” ($15.2M in the first two quarters of 2010), “Proceeds received on sale of exploration assets” ($13.9M in Q1), and “Proceeds from Petromin for Elk and Antelope field development” ($5M over the past 12 months).

To summarize, InterOil has only $31.7 million in unrestricted cash as of June 30th and they’re burning an average of $45.5 million of cash each quarter. No wonder the company entered a short-term $25 million credit facility last week on distressed terms: 10% interest (in this environment!), secured by a 2.5% stake in InterOil’s Elk and Antelope fields. Note that the provider of financing was a very dicey outfit, Clarion Finanz and known stock promoter Carlo Civelli – see this post."

In the past, we've also highlighted some of T2's other short positions for those interested. And for more on interpreting SEC filings correctly, head to our post from yesterday regarding Eric Mindich's hedge fund Eton Park and lessons regarding 13F filings.


Kyle Bass Betting Against Japanese Government Bonds (JGBs)

Kyle Bass of hedge fund Hayman Advisors has a very dim outlook on parts of the world. In a recent interview with CNBC, Bass laid out his themes his hedge fund is playing and positions they've taken as a result. Remember that Kyle Bass will be presenting ideas at the Value Investing Congress in October as well. Market Folly readers can receive a discount here.

Hayman is positioned to benefit from a Japanese restructuring that will likely take place over the next few years. Bass defines the Keynesian end-point as, "when your debt service excedes your revenue". And, he thinks Japan is there. Japan's tax receipts in nominal terms are the same as they were back in 1985, whereas their expenses are 200% higher. He argues that Japan is in secular decline and they're spending roughly twice what they make. Japan has funded themselves by selling bonds to their citizens at low rates and he doesn't feel they'll be able to do this anymore.

As you can see, he has outlined tail risk plays. At the same time, he is trying to earn nominal returns while he waits for these tail events to pay off. As such, 35% of Hayman's investments are in US Mortgages, 25% are in bank debt, 17% are in U.S. distressed positions, and 23% are in high yield. Now these are some of Hayman's 'core' positions but it sounds as though Bass thinks his tail positions could possibly generate quite a return.

In particular, he's focused on Japanese Government Bonds (JGBs). Of them, Bass notes, "At a time at which the bond I think is the most risky asset (or one of them) in the world, the pricing of that asset using the Black-Scholes model is the best it's ever been. So you have this huge convex moment that you can put enormous positions on in Japanese interest rates very cheaply."

Overall, in terms of tail risk plays, he's positioned 10-15% of his portfolio betting against European sovereigns and Japan. Given his view of the world, Bass doesn't know how you can be long stocks. If you want to become instantly depressed, he's the guy to talk to. And Bass isn't the only well known investor betting against Japanese JGBs. In a recent interview, Passport Capital's John Burbank has been short Japanese Government Bonds as well.

Embedded below is a video of Kyle Bass' recent television appearance (email readers will have to come to the site to watch it):














To hear both John Burbank (Passport Capital) and Kyle Bass (Hayman Advisors) present investment ideas, register for the upcoming Value Investing Congress (special discount here).


Tuesday, August 17, 2010

Gold is NOT Eric Mindich's Biggest Holding: A Memo to Bloomberg Regarding 13F Filings

Yesterday afternoon, Bloomberg ran a piece entitled, "Eric Mindich, Like John Paulson, Makes Gold ETF His Fund's Biggest Holding." There's just one problem with that headline: it's not really correct. Here at Market Folly, we pride ourselves on in-depth analysis of SEC Filings, and in particular, the 13F's that disclose the latest hedge fund investments. And today, we get the perfect chance to prove it.

The SPDR Gold Trust (GLD) is not the largest holding at Eric Mindich's hedge fund Eton Park Capital Management. As per the most recent 13F detailing positions as of June 30th, 2010, Eton Park's largest position is puts on the iShares MSCI Emerging Market Index (EEM). At quarter close, Mindich's position in GLD was valued at $800,289,000. His put position on EEM was valued at $895,680,000. In the second quarter, Eton Park actually increased their bet against EEM by 61%, buying puts representing 9,100,000 additional shares. Their put exposure on this name now represents 24,000,000 shares of EEM.

Maybe Bloomberg's data-set didn't take into consideration the put/call column on the actual filing. (Numerous automated data sorting programs skip over this and omit options positions entirely). Maybe it was an honest mistake. Maybe Bloomberg doesn't classify puts as an 'investment' and so it merely comes down to technicalities of the language used in their article. But even if that was the case, you still can't really call the SPDR Gold Trust their single 'biggest reported investment'.

Why? Well, because Eton Park also owns both puts and calls on GLD as well. In the second quarter, Mindich's hedge fund bought the following:

$800,289,000 worth of SPDR Gold Trust (GLD) shares
$608,400,000 worth of GLD calls
$486,720,000 worth of GLD puts

We don't know their true exposure to gold because a 13F filing does not disclose the strike price or expiration date of underlying options positions. However, you could net out their ownership of common shares, calls and puts to find that they have around $921,969,000 worth of long exposure to GLD. But you also have to keep in mind that Eton Park is an arbitrage focused fund. As such, all of these discrepancies are relevant to determine the type of wager they are making with various positions.

The only way that GLD is Eton Park's top holding is if Bloomberg is treating all of the above as gross exposure to GLD or if they are netting out the exposure as we have above. But even then, there was no mention of this in their article at all. They merely cited the $800 million position in the underlying shares. The fact that Bloomberg completely omitted the information that Eton Park owns both calls and puts on the same exchange traded fund is somewhat appalling. It's one thing to own just the shares of GLD as a directional bet (as they've mistakenly construed). It's entirely different when you add in ownership of both puts and calls on the underlying shares as those affect the net position and exposure. Nevermind that Bloomberg missed the fact that their standalone position of GLD shares are not Eton Park's 'biggest reported investment' in the first place.

The comical part of all of this is that Bloomberg completely skipped over Eton Park's options positions in both EEM and GLD, and yet they end their article with this note (emphasis added by MarketFolly):

"The SEC requires money managers who oversee more than $100 million in U.S. equities to report their holdings on a Form 13F within 45 days of the end of each quarter. The filing must include all holdings in stocks that trade on U.S. exchanges, as well as options and convertible debt."

Factually, Eton Park's largest single reported holding is in puts of the iShares MSCI Emerging Market Index (EEM). Their position in shares of the SPDR Gold Trust (GLD) is the second largest reported holding. But even then, there's some ambiguity surrounding their entire GLD exposure and the type of wager they're making when you consider the puts and calls they also own. This just goes to show that attention to detail is a must when examining SEC 13F filings.

Apologies for this little diatribe, but it's irritating when potential misinformation is floated around, especially by a mainstream media source. In the end, Bloomberg will probably update the article from 'biggest' holding to 'big' holding or something of the sort (with zero mention of Market Folly of course). That's perfectly fine, as long as they remedy the misinformation that's currently out there. Our readers know where to come for hedge fund portfolio updates.

Stay tuned this week as we are set to release an in-depth summary of the new batch of 13F filings and latest positions of the top hedge funds in the game. For more on Eric Mindich's hedge fund, we also detailed Eton Park's new Doral Financial (DRL) position.


Monday, August 16, 2010

Eric Mindich's Eton Park Discloses New Doral Financial Position (DRL)

Per a 13G filed with the SEC due to portfolio activity on August 6th, 2010, Eric Mindich's hedge fund Eton Park Capital has disclosed a new position. Eton Park has revealed a 7.52% ownership stake in Doral Financial Corporation (DRL) with 8,444,354 shares. However, this percentage is based on the current amount of shares outstanding. Realistically, Doral will have more shares outstanding due to conversion of "mandatorily convertible non-cumulative non-voting preferred stock". So if you were to base the figure on the anticipated number of shares outstanding, Eton Park would own a 6.63% stake.

Breaking down the position at Mindich's hedge fund, we see that they own 3,827,091 shares of common stock and then 21,932 shares of preferred stock which will convert into 4,617,263 additional common shares. All in all, this is a newly disclosed position as it did not appear in our past coverage of Eton Park's portfolio. Mindich founded Eton Park after being named the youngest partner in Goldman Sachs history at age 27. He launched with $3 billion in 2004, one of the largest hedge fund launches ever. Mindich's hedge fund is primarily arbitrage focused and we've detailed some of their previous new positions as well.

Doral Financial Corporation is "a bank holding company. Doral Financial’s operations are principally conducted in Puerto Rico. The Company also operates in the New York City metropolitan area. Doral Financial manages its business through three operating segments: banking (including thrift operations), mortgage banking and insurance agency."

Stay up to date with the latest hedge fund portfolio movements on our site daily.


Eliav Assouline & Marc Andersen's Axial Capital Adds QLTI Again

Eliav Assouline and Marc Andersen's hedge fund Axial Capital Management are at it again. They've purchased an additional 100,000 shares of QLT Inc (QLTI) at a price of $5.70. The purchase, which took place on August 11th, 2010, means that Assouline & Andersen's hedge fund now owns 6,441,812 QLTI shares. As we've extensively detailed, Axial has been buying QLTI over the course of a few months.

Some investors have categorized QLT Inc as a value trap while others think of it as a 'cigarette-butt' value play. Essentially, many investors are betting on the biotech company's royalty stream. Those categorizing it as a value trap think that this royalty stream, while healthy now, is likely to decline. Andersen and Assouline obviously disagree with that take since they have been accumulating shares.

Axial Capital was listed as one of Institutional Investor's 'Hedge Fund Rising Stars.' The hedge fund was seeded back in 2005 by Julian Robertson and offices at the same 101 Park Avenue address as legendary hedge fund Tiger Management. You can view the proverbial Tiger Family Tree of managers that Robertson has spawned or seeded.

Taken from Google Finance, "biotechnology company. The Company is engaged in the development and commercialization of therapies for the eye. The Company focuses on its commercial product, Visudyne, for the treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration (wet AMD), and developing its ophthalmic product candidates."

To see what other top managers are up to, head to our collection of recent hedge fund investor letters.


Jack Schwager ~ Quote of the Week

Today's Market Folly quote of the week comes from Jack Schwager, author of many renowned books on financial markets, the aptly named Market Wizards series. Mr. Schwager has had the privilege of interviewing and interacting with many of the top hedge fund managers in the game. As such, he's built up quite a collection of wisdom. Here's our quote of the week focused on human behavior/psychology when it comes to risk & reward:

"In one experiment, subjects were given a hypothetical choice between a sure $3,000 gain versus an 80 percent chance of a $4,000 gain and a 20 percent chance of not getting anything. The vast majority of people preferred the sure $3000 gain, even though the other alternative had a higher expected gain (0.80 X $4,000 = $3,200). Then they flipped the question around and gave people a choice between a certain loss of $3,000 versus an 80 percent chance of losing $4,000 and a 20 percent chance of not losing anything. In this case, the vast majority chose to gamble and take the 80 percent chance of a $4,000 loss, even though the expected loss would be $3,200.

In both cases, people made irrational choices because they selected the alternative with the worse expected gain or greater expected loss. Why? Because the experiment reflects a quirk in human behavior in regards to risk and gain: people are risk averse when it comes to gains, but risk takers when it comes to avoiding a loss. And this relates very much to trading. It is exactly the quirk in human psychology that causes people to let their losses run and cut their profits short. So the old cliché of let your profits run and cut your losses short is actually the exact opposite of what human nature tends to do."

~ Jack Schwager

We highly recommend checking out Jack Schwager's books:

- Market Wizards
- Technical Analysis Study Guide
- Complete Guide to the Futures Markets

They are full of a ton of interviews and insight from top hedge fund managers, traders, and the like.


Friday, August 13, 2010

Ira Sohn Investment Conference in San Francisco: Excellence in Investing

The highly regarded hedge fund conference, the Ira Sohn Investment Research Conference, is expanding west. The 1st annual Excellence in Investing Conference will take place in San Francisco on October 6th from 2:30-6pm. This event was inspired by and patterned after the Ira Sohn Investment Research Conference that takes place in New York. A portion of the proceeds goes to the Ira Sohn Foundation to benefit pediatric cancer research. Other proceeds go to Leadership Public Schools (LPS), an organization that aims to provide students from low-income homes an excellent education. You can learn more about the event at www.irasohnsanfrancisco.com. Needless to say, this is a great cause.

The speakers list is chalk full of excellent names, including:

John Burbank of Passport Capital
Barry Rosenstein of JANA Partners
Jeffrey Ubben of ValueAct Capital
Thomas Russo of Gardner Russo & Gardner
Mitch Julis of Canyon Partners
Robert Rosner of Buena Vista Fund Management
Arthur Patterson of Accel Partners
Richard Farber of Kayne Anderson
Christopher Chabris, co-author of The Invisible Gorilla
John B. Taylor, Senior Fellow in Economics at the Hoover Institution

The event also will feature the auction of a rare first edition copy of The Intelligent Investor that is signed by Warren Buffett himself. In-depth biographies of the speakers and more information on the event can be found in the Ira Sohn San Francisco's invitation embedded below:



You can download a .pdf of the invitation here.



To attend the event and hear investment ideas from top managers, embedded below is the Excellence in Investing registration form:




You can download a .pdf of the registration form here.

If you're in the nearby San Francisco area, definitely check it out. There are some excellent speakers lined up and the proceeds go to a great cause. We've covered the New York Ira Sohn Conference in-depth and those of you who read our coverage of that know it will be a fantastic event.

You can learn more about the event at www.irasohnsanfrancisco.com.


Thursday, August 12, 2010

Passport Capital's John Burbank on 13F's & Following Other Managers

Benzinga has an excellent interview up with the founder of Passport Capital, John Burbank. In it, we get a good look at how he became a hedge fund manager and the investor he is today. Passport was up 219% in 2007 due to his successful bet against subprime securities. While the hedge fund has seen some volatility the past few years, you can't argue with their solid returns of 23.6% annualized. As of late, Passport has been short Japanese government bonds under the notion that if national governments default on their debt, Japan would be one of the first to do so. Keep in mind that Burbank and many other prominent hedge fund managers will be presenting investment ideas at the Value Investing Congress this October in New York (receive a special discount here).

Maybe the most intriguing aspect of Burbank's interview was the fact that he addressed the SEC 13F filing where investment managers are required to disclose their long positions to the public on a quarterly basis. Many hedgies feel that this transparency almost gives away their 'secret sauce' as it reveals the majority of their positions and strategies. Not Burbank though:

"Do you think that 13-F filings are unfair in the way they force hedge fund managers to reveal their strategies?

Yes, but I'm not actually so upset about transparency because I think it's a trend that we should all expect. We typically take positions and tell investors, and the world about them. The question is whether or not the people are going to believe our views. We don't mind if they know what we own or what were short."

We can attest to his assertion that Passport doesn't mind if people know what they own. After all, we've detailed Passport's portfolio via their investor letters. Transparency is often seen as a double-edged sword in the hedge fund industry because everyone knows more of it is needed and assume it will eventually come. But at the same time, some secretly want to hold out as long as possible. It's good to see that Burbank fully expects transparency and takes an open approach.

The Passport Capital hedge fund manager was then also asked about the topic of following other investment managers. Bruce Berkowitz of Fairholme Capital has readily advocated following other managers and checking out their holdings for idea generation and potential investments to do due diligence on. Burbank agrees with this notion and the interesting thing here is that he kind of follows like-minded investors rather than focusing on managers that have different viewpoints:

"Which traders and money managers do you follow?

Probably more the ones that have expressed tremendous skepticism about the current environment. I started 10 years ago and my belief was that the market was extremely expensive, and I have essentially been betting against the US markets since. Now I'm in the position of regarding the government as an enormous risk toward our wealth and sovereignty. Therefore, I pay particular attention to those who have views about that because I want to learn from them and follow their thinking. It's also a means of discounting the positive stories always being heard about the market."

To hear Burbank and Passport's latest investment ideas, be sure to head to the Value Investing Congress (special discount included). The Passport Capital hedge fund manager will also be presenting at the Ira Sohn San Francisco Conference in October as well where the proceeds go to a great cause.

View the rest of Burbank's interview at Benzinga with part one here and part two here.


Market Strategist Jeff Saut Thinks March 2009 Lows Will Hold

The Chief Investment Strategist at Raymond James is out with his latest market commentary and there are a few bold assertions in it. Jeff Saut is of the belief that the market will be in a very wide trading range akin to the period between 1966-1982; a period where swings of more than 20% occurred 13 times with an end result of hardly any progress. He also bluntly calls for the March 2009 lows to hold. In a past commentary, he also advocated buying on weakness. But if you think about it, he's not exactly taking a huge leap of faith here considering that the S&P is currently around 1,082 and the March lows are way down around 666 on the S&P. Even if those levels were to hold, that's still over a 38% drop to get there.

So, how has the market strategist positioned his portfolio? Saut remains ardent in his stance that buying high quality dividend paying stocks is the way to go. Numerous market participants agree. Jeremy Grantham favors high quality and hedge fund T2 Partners is bullish on undervalued large-caps, just to name a few.

Additionally, Saut notes that, "The earnings yield (E/P) on the S&P 500 is currently 6.6%, which is the highest in 15 years, while the spread beween the earnings yield and the 30-year Treasury Bond is the widest in 30 years." As such, he feels that risk adjusted stock selection is the key to portfolio success currently and he tosses out some stocks for your consideration.

The companies on his list have the following attributes: a market cap greater than $5 billion, a return on equity greater than 15%, a dividend yield greater than 2%, a debt-to-assets ratio of less than 35%, and a price-to-earnings ratio of less than 15. Here are the stocks that made the cut:

Exxon Mobil (XOM)
Walmart (WMT)
Johnson & Johnson (JNJ)
Intel (INTC)
Abbott Labs (ABT)
Aflac (AFL)
Chubb (CB)
Diamond Offshore (DO)
Darden (DRI)

Lastly, turning to the inflation versus deflation debate, Saut highlights that except for the 1930s, deflation has been a bad bet. In fact, Saut isn't buying into the current hype surrounding deflation and has actually planted himself in the inflationary camp. He feels that the economic recovery will surely be slow, but a double-dip won't come to fruition. Following this recovery, he believes inflation is the likely scenario given the government's policy of trying to stimulate an economic response. And since Saut has declared himself a staunch inflationista, be sure to check out the best investments for inflation. And if you disagree, conversely head to the best investments during deflation.

Embedded below is Jeff Saut's latest investment strategy from Raymond James:



You can download a .pdf copy here.

For more from the market strategist, you can check out Jeff Saut's businessman's risk portfolio as well as his assertion that it's time to re-balance portfolios.


Tilson's Hedge Fund Positioned Conservatively, Sees Unfavorable Economic Outlook

Whitney Tilson and Glenn Tongue's hedge fund T2 Partners is faring quite well in 2010, up 13.6% net of fees. They've taken a conservative position with their portfolio based on increasing concerns of a weak economy. As we've detailed in their previous presentation, they currently favor undervalued large-cap stocks. Their July letter to investors reveals that they are currently 100% long, 70% short, leaving them 30% net long. This is below the historical average for hedge funds and T2 Partners has taken such a position for two reasons.

Firstly, they're concerned about macro factors and cite Jeremy Grantham's recent letter. Vaguely speaking, they deduce that there are three possible economic scenarios at hand that can take place over the next 2-7 years.

1. A V-shaped recovery: A scenario where the stock market could compound 7-10%.
2. A 'muddle-through' economy: Stock market could compound at 2-5%.
3. A double-dip (or worse): Somewhat similar to what Japan's gone through, stocks could be anywhere from flat to way down.

Tilson and Tongue have built a conservative portfolio as the odds have shifted unfavorably as of late. They are long high quality large-caps such as Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A), Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD), and Microsoft (MSFT). They've also been long BP (in-depth analysis of BP here) and Liberty Acquisition Corp. warrants as special situations plays. Additionally, we've detailed T2's new position in Alloy (ALOY). While they like these names, their economic outlook has caused them to reduce longs and add to shorts.

Secondly, they cite numerous opportunities on the short side of the portfolio. When irrationality rears its head, T2 prefers to exploit the inefficiency. As such, they feel they can enhance their returns on this side of the portfolio. Some examples of current irrationality in their view include:

- VistaPrint (VPRT) still at $33 (it's now at $30 after the release of T2's letter). This is a classic 'growth gone bust' story and they are short.

- InterOil (IOC) at $60. We've detailed in the past how T2 feels that InterOil is a public relations hype machine, releasing news tidbit after news tidbit when fundamentally the company doesn't have a whole lot going on. They've been short for a while now.

- MBIA (MBI) at $8.68. They feel that bond insurers are in a precarious position given their struggles. Bill Ackman had previously been short this name and his investment was detailed in the book, Confidence Game: How a Hedge Fund Manager Called Wall Street's Bluff.

- The for-profit education sector. Like many other hedge funds, T2 has joined in on the negativity parade surrounding these stocks. While they don't disclose which specific companies they are short, it most likely includes a basket of these possible candidates: Apollo Group (APOL), ITT Educational (ESI), and Corinthian Colleges (COCO). For the elaborate thesis behind this play, check out Steve Eisman's short sale of for-profit education.


Overall, T2 has been adding to short positions and is increasingly focused on large-cap bluechips on the long side of their portfolio. Embedded below is T2 Partners July letter to investors:



You can download a .pdf copy here.

To hear many other hedge funds' latest investment ideas, Tilson will be presenting at the Value Investing Congress (special discount here) along with Bill Ackman, David Einhorn, Lee Ainslie, Kyle Bass, John Burbank, and many more.


Second Curve Starts New Tennessee Commerce Bancorp (TNCC) Position

Tom Brown's hedge fund Second Curve Capital recently disclosed a stake in Tennessee Commerce Bancorp (TNCC). Per a 13G filed with the SEC, Second Curve shows a 5.1% ownership stake in TNCC with 584,221 shares due to portfolio activity on August 5th, 2010. This is a brand new position for the firm as it did not appear in our previous coverage of Second Curve's portfolio. In terms of other activity from Tom Brown's hedge fund, we detailed their increased stake in Western Alliance (WAL) last month.

Taken from Google Finance, Tennessee Commerce Bancorp is "a bank holding company formed to own the shares of Tennessee Commerce Bank (the Bank). The Bank conducts business from a single location in the Cool Springs commercial area of Franklin. As of December 31, 2009, the Bank had total assets of $1.4 billion. The Bank offers a range of retail and commercial banking services".

To see what else prominent managers are investing in, scroll through our daily coverage of hedge fund portfolios.


What We're Reading ~ 8/12/10

Top Hedge Fund Investors [Cathleen Rittereiser]

10 hedge fund favorites for dividend yield [Ycharts]

Q&A session with James Altucher [The Kirk Report]

On the equity risk premium [Abnormal Returns]

Some great investing sites to check out: leaders of the new school [Reformed Broker]

Income investing: stocks versus bonds [Marketwatch Fundmastery]

A fund manager's take on Microsoft (MSFT) [Bronte Capital]

Great summary of some recent insider buying and selling [Sin Letter]

On the similarities between trading and poker [Chris Perruna]

GGP: a case study on internet activism [Distressed Debt Investing]

Bullish presentation on Exxon Mobil (XOM) [ValuePlays]

AerCap (AER) valuation at 20,000 feet [Harbor Investing]

Harbinger Capital opening Asia Fund [FINalternatives]

Dan Loeb, you're boring me [Institutional Investor]

Hedge funds post July gains [Reuters]

A lesson in how not to value Apple (AAPL) [Fortune]


Tuesday, August 10, 2010

Best Investments During Inflation

So, what is the best investment during inflation? The good news is that there are a multitude of securities and assets that can protect against inflationary pressure. The bad news is if such a scenario comes to fruition, your purchasing power is reduced. The main thing to keep an eye on is the money supply. Throughout the crisis, the monetary base has expanded, but has yet to materialize in the money supply. If/when this comes to fruition, you'll be prepared after learning how to invest for inflation below.

Interestingly enough, deflation has been the top concern amongst investors as of late and yesterday we detailed the best investments during deflation. But investors have quickly forgotten that inflation was the primary concern just a mere few months ago. This revisits a post we originally published in August 2008 examining investment scenarios for inflation versus deflation. Regardless of outcome, investors need to be prepared for either.

Why should you be worried about inflation? Well, how about because one of the greatest investors of this generation is concerned. Yup, Baupost Group's Seth Klarman is worried about inflation. Not to mention, Kyle Bass, the hedge fund manager who predicted the subprime crisis as well as sovereign defaults has voiced concern about inflation and significant currency devaluation around the globe. For every prominent investor worried about deflation, there is another concerned with the converse scenario.

Here are the best investments during inflation:

Avoid Cash/US Dollars: Inflation typically results in domestic currency devaluing. You can fight this by simply not holding it and allocating the capital into other assets and investments. Nowadays, cash is most certainly part of the asset allocation picture. During inflation, you want to have as little of it on hand if possible. Since it devalues during inflation, those of you wishing to press your bets against the US dollar can buy the PowerShares Bearish US dollar index fund (UDN).


Buy Gold & Precious Metals: If you'll think back toward the end of the crisis, gold was all the rage. As the Federal Reserve's printing presses worked overtime to churn out US dollars to resuscitate the economy, many became very worried about inflation. Their number one investment to protect against this? Gold. While precious metals in general are a solid bet, gold in particular is seen as a hedge against uncertainty and a store of value. For an in-depth thesis as to why you should buy gold during inflation, we turn you to out post on successful hedge fund manager John Paulson's gold fund. He launched this vehicle last year as a means of betting against the US dollar. Another option is the stocks of companies that mine the metal. One hedge fund recently opined that gold is good, but gold mining stocks are better.

We've detailed how countless other prominent investment managers favor yellow bricks. John Burbank's Passport Capital outlined the rationale for owning physical gold. David Einhorn's hedge fund Greenlight Capital also owns physical gold. Those of you who don't have access to physical bars can invest via the SPDR Gold Fund (GLD). Practically all of the hedge funds that are not investing in physical gold use this investment vehicle for their gold exposure. If gold doesn't tickle your fancy, legendary investor Jim Rogers sees opportunity in silver and palladium which can provide you with precious metals exposure. PALL is the ticker for playing palladium while SLV is a way to play silver.


Buy Crude Oil: Going long oil ties into the whole 'buy commodities' theme as protection. In a truly inflationary environment, oil is supply inelastic; any increase or decrease in price would not result in a corresponding increase or decrease in supply. In the past we've outlined how to invest in crude oil, as there are many investment vehicles out there, each with pros and cons. These funds include USO, DBO, & USL and are examined in-depth via the link above.


Short Fixed Income: Bonds should be avoided due to a weak domestic monetary system. In particular, avoid US Treasuries as they will underperform. As yields start to rise, bond prices will fall. A plethora of prominent investors have gone this route in order to gain inflationary protection. Seth Klarman has purchased out of the money puts on bonds. He's acquired tail risk insurance against a sharp rise in interest rates that protects him should rates skyrocket to 10%. Legendary hedge fund manager Julian Robertson had previously put on a curve steepener trade and then shifted to a constant maturity swap (CMS) trade. These are more advanced trades and typically are reserved for institutional investors. Retail investors can buy puts on or short the iShares 20+ Year Treasury (TLT).


Buy Emerging Markets: A weak domestic currency (US dollar) implies higher returns can be found abroad in other countries. A monetary system in trouble in the home land means your dollars should be invested abroad (especially consider commodity producing nations such as Australia and Brazil). You can invest in either emerging market currencies, equities abroad, or investment funds denominated in those foreign currencies. For broad emerging market equities exposure, one can purchase iShares Emerging Markets Index (EEM). For the Australian Dollar, consider FXA and for Brazilian exposure, consider EWZ.


Buy Technology: While this was also a suggestion for investing during deflationary times, it applies to inflation under the same rationale. Regardless of environment, technology is in demand and will continue to evolve.


Buy Treasury Inflation Protected Securities: These types of treasuries (known as TIPS for short) provide the safety of a government bond with the bonus of protection against inflation. You can buy these outright, or via the iShares Barclays TIPS fund (TIP).


While inflation was all the talk only a few months ago, it has since taken a back seat to deflationary chatter. Given the back and forth, it only makes sense to examine both scenarios. In the depths of the 2008 crisis we broadly examined investment scenarios for inflation versus deflation. At the time, it was unclear what type of environment we'd be entering. While still not entirely evident to this day, many have postulated that deflation in the near-term will then give way to inflation in the longer-term. A compromise of views, if you will. We've mapped out inflationary defenses above and for a look at the converse scenario, be sure to check out the best investments for deflation. Now you have a loose framework for either environment.


Monday, August 9, 2010

Best Investments During Deflation

Today we're laying a loose framework for the best investments during deflation. Why? Because deflationary signals have reared their ugly head as of late. Not to mention, many prominent investment managers have voiced their concern about the dreaded scenario. While inflation versus deflation has been the great debate over the past two years, the deflationistas have been boasting quite loudly as of late.

We've detailed how David Gerstenhaber's global macro hedge fund Argonaut Capital thinks deflation is the greater risk. Additionally, Broyhill's Affinity hedge fund has been betting on deflation as of late. PIMCO's bond king Bill Gross has been buying treasuries in order to combat these fears. And for more, The Reformed Broker has a quick summary of the New York Times' deflation round-up as well.

While investing during the dreaded 'D' word is not impossible, the options to preserve and grow capital are certainly limited. So, what is the best investment for deflation? Very broadly and in no particular order, here's some potential answers:


Cash/US Dollar: The phrase "cash is king" is often cliche. It's not cliche during deflation, it's rule number one. Assuredly, cash is one of the few 'safe' investments you can make in this scenario. Over the normal course of investing, most investors focus on their return on capital. This time around, the focus is simply on return *of* capital. While many wouldn't consider this an investment, having physical cash notes saved and on hand can be crucial during extreme situations including: bank failures, a collapse in credit, or the government defaulting on its debt. Not to mention, the US dollar has been a strong performer during deflationary times. Holding the physical currency is easy enough, but those wishing to further their wager can play the PowerShares US Dollar Bullish Index (UUP).


Pay Off Debt: Again while 'paying down debt' doesn't sound like an investment, it most definitely is during deflation. In a period where literally every single dollar matters, each dollar of debt can become crippling.


Buy Long-Term Bonds: Alternative to cash, fixed income is also seen as an option for those who seek protection. While fixed income yields decline due to Federal Reserve easing in an effort to combat deflation, the underlying bond should appreciate (or at the very least, depreciate much less than equities). US Treasuries are highly coveted here as they are the safest and most in-demand. If one were to go the corporate bond route, seeking high quality bonds is preferred. The thesis behind this play is laid out by Broyhill's Affinity hedge fund in their presentations: ten reasons to buy bonds as well as their bet on long-term treasuries. The most logical wager here would be the iShares Barclays 20+ year Treasury (TLT).


Short Equities: Traditional investments will start to suffer as underlying companies will see lower margins and losses. Not to mention, highly leveraged companies make ideal short selling targets and certain companies can face the risk of becoming insolvent. If your conviction is strong enough, you could simply short the S&P 500 index (SPY). There is, however, one potential safe haven in equities (keyword being 'potential'), which brings us to the next investment:


Buy High Quality Dividend Paying Stocks: Understand that during deflation, equities in general are one of the major investments to avoid. However, high quality stocks could be a potentially dim light in an otherwise dark scenario. While the majority of companies will lose pricing power and succumb to weak margins, large cap high quality companies that dominate their industries may be able to maintain pricing power. Not to mention, many of these stocks pay dividends which generate valuable cash during deflation. Seek companies with pristine balance sheets.

GMO's Jeremy Grantham recently voiced concern about deflation and one of his few investment recommendations was to buy high quality stocks. For ideas, hedge fund T2 Partners recently issued a presentation on 3 large cap stocks. Sectors to look toward include healthcare, technology, and telecom as those have outperformed in Japan during their deflationary lost decade. Microsoft (MSFT) is one name that has been repeatedly mentioned by strategists and managers. Keep in mind though that despite being high quality blue-chip companies, these are still equities. As such, there is obviously inherent risk in owning them during deflation.


Short Housing/Avoid Real Estate: In deflation, prices fall. As such, rent rather than own. Stand back and let the landlords watch the values of their properties plummet. You can short the iShares Dow Jones US Real Estate (IYR) for some exposure.


Short Leverage: Deleveraging should be a big theme playing out in the future, environment notwithstanding. As mentioned earlier, short the equity of companies that have poor balance sheets and are highly levered. In deflation, leverage begins to unwind and currency plays can be found. A massive leveraged carry trade in the Yen has taken place over the years and as such would be unwound in deflation, thus benefiting the Yen.


Long Technology: Regardless of environment, technology will advance and will be in demand. The technology sector was highlighted as one of the few areas to possible allocate capital in high quality equities. Companies that have strangleholds on their industry should have an advantage. A basket of technology stocks could be purchased via the technology exchange traded fund (XLK). However, that gives you exposure to a lot of companies and it's probably more preferable to single out high quality technology names with pristine balance sheets such as Microsoft (MSFT), Intel (INTC), and Cisco Systems (CSCO).


Gold: Conventional wisdom says to avoid precious metals during deflation. During the Great Depression from 1929-1932, commodities in general crashed. However, in very extreme circumstances (emphasis on extreme), some have argued that gold can make sense when acting as currency. The majority of proponents for owning gold during deflation would cite its store of value or hedge against uncertainty. While gold can be played via the SPDR Gold Fund (GLD), many hedge funds advocate physical gold. That said, those doing so are mainly seeking inflationary protection.


Buy TIPS: Treasury Inflation Protected Securities, or TIPS, serve as long-term protection from inflation. Buying TIPS during deflation? What's the point? This is an option if investors believe that deflation will eventually lead to inflation two or three years later. As policy makers attempt to combat deflation, the natural antidote is inflationary medicine. As such, investors looking further down the road can fend off these inflationary pressures with TIPS. And even if deflation persists for an extended period of time, TIPS still produce income via yield and investors can regain their bond's face value at maturity. This can be played via iShares Barclays TIPS Bond Fund (TIP) for those looking for an easy solution.


That sums up some of the best ways to position a portfolio when confronted with deflation. Recent concern is duly warranted considering that deflation typically rears its ugly head after periods of prolonged globalization and global growth. Such growth leads to increased investment, a massive increase in production, and thus excess capacity all around the world. This excess capacity then brings forth lower prices. In deflation, companies suffer while the consumer is the real winner. The above present theoretical options of how to invest during such a scenario. Make no mistake though, investing during deflation can be quite difficult and painful.

Back in August 2008 when the crisis was heating up, we penned a very broad outline of investment scenarios for inflation versus deflation. During the pinnacle of the crisis, it wasn't quite clear which situation would play out so it made sense to lay a framework for each context. (And arguably, it's still not entirely clear. Many have hypothesized that we'll see a compromise of views: deflation in the near-term and inflation in the long-term). A few months ago, inflation was all the rage. Now, deflation is the primary concern. Investors have been flip-flopping more frequently than politicians as of late.

Regardless of outcome, it makes sense to be prepared for either environment. Check back tomorrow as we'll turn the tables and outline the best investments during inflation in order to present both sides of the argument. In the mean time, be sure to see what hedge funds are investing in these days with our daily coverage.


Hedge Fund AltaRock's Investing Principles: Treating Stocks as Ownership in a Business

Today we're pleased to present you with commentary from Mark Massey's hedge fund AltaRock. Since his money managing inception in 1989, Massey has outperformed the market with a compound annual growth rate of 11.1%. AltaRock is long-term oriented and the results serve as a perfect testament from investors with the same focus.

The main reason we wanted to highlight their mid-year letter to partners is because Massey outlines some very Warren Buffett-esque tenets of investing. And Buffett, of course, inherited many of these ideologies from his mentor Benjamin Graham, the author of investment classics such as The Intelligent Investor and Security Analysis. Just like Graham and Buffett, AltaRock treat their positions not just as pieces of paper, but as actual ownership stakes in a given business. They approach their portfolio as a conglomerate with various subsidiaries and are looking for numerous characteristics in their investments. While the letter delves into these in much more detail (a must-read), we've outlined the criterion broadly below:

- Sustainable Competitive Advantage
- Strong Profitability
- Shareholder Friendly Management
- Sell Necessities
- Global Diversity
- Strong Balance Sheet
- Strong Free Cash Flow
- Good Growth
- Cheap Valuation
- Current Long-Term Expectations
- Historical Context

And while these generalized characteristics are staples of fundamental investing, AltaRock truly drills down the specific traits they are looking for in each category. The key here is that they approach their fund as a conglomerate owning various other businesses. As Benjamin Graham said in our quote of the week, "Investing is most intelligent when it is most businesslike."

In addition to laying the framework above, AltaRock's Massey also touches on the dilemma of holding cash versus investing it. Many investors view cash almost as an asset class of its own as it always has a place in a portfolio. On the topic, Massey writes,

"While cash currently pays us nothing, it does provide us with the potentially valuable option of snapping up bargains that may emerge in the months and years ahead. We find ourselves equally convinced to hold more or less cash as we focus alternatively on the potentially poor macroeconomic environment on the one hand, and the cheap prices of the very high quality companies we currently own on the other hand.

When the market is declining, cash always feels great, but to the extent that we can find excellent long-term investments in superior businesses, we don't want to forgo them. A bargain in a great company is our holy grail; to ignore it in the hopes of even better deals in the future seems foolish to us. After all, we can never really know if a better bargain will appear in the future, but we do know with near certainty that a great business purchased today at a bargain price will compound our wealth at healthy rates over the long term and with very little risk of loss."

These are truly words of a fundamental investor. If you think about, legendary manager Seth Klarman at Baupost Group typically holds an abnormally large amount of cash on hand for a myriad of reasons. While this can serve somewhat as a hedge during down markets, it is more-so a function of having dry powder to invest when compelling prices arise. Massey highlights what a conundrum it can be when balancing bottom-up company fundamentals and a top-down macro assessment.

While the macroeconomic environment is admittedly concerning to them, they are still confident that the underlying tenets above will provide them with safety and wealth generation going forward. A fantastic approach to investing is outlined in AltaRock's hedge fund mid-year letter embedded below:



You can download a .pdf copy here.

To learn the pillars of fundamental investing, there is nowhere else to point you but Warren Buffett's recommended reading list. The approach outlined above is decisively Buffettesque in its focus on owning a business rather than a stock. For more on a value investing framework, head to our fundamentals reading list and for more great market commentary from top managers, check out our latest coverage of hedge fund letters.


Ben Graham ~ Quote of the Week

Given that we touch on value investing topics from time to time, we thought it appropriate today to feature a quotation from the father of value investing, Benjamin Graham. The Market Folly quote of the week is simple and straight to the point:

"Investing is most intelligent when it is most businesslike."

~ Benjamin Graham


Graham's works on investing are of course must-reads and include The Intelligent Investor and Security Analysis. Stay tuned later this morning as we'll post up an in-depth look at treating stocks like business ownership, an inherent principle of value investing outlined by hedge fund AltaRock in their recent investor letter.