Oaktree Capital's Howard Marks Speaking at the Value Investing Congress

Readers of the site should be familiar with Oaktree Capital's Howard Marks as we've posted his commentary numerous times and found it very insightful. Now you can hear his latest thoughts on the markets and his favorite investment ideas as he will be speaking on May 3rd & 4th in Pasadena, California. Learn more about the Value Investing Congress.

Marks is a contrarian and founded Oaktree in 1995 and now manages over $80 billion. He has a new book coming out entitled The Most Important Thing: Uncommon Sense for the Thoughtful Investor and everyone attending the event will receive a free copy.

Additionally, Guy Gottfriend will be presenting. He is the founder of Rational Investment Group and has generated net returns of 40% per annum since launching in 2009 while holding 25% of assets in cash.

Here's the full list of speakers at the event:

- Howard Marks, Oaktree Capital
- Jeffrey Ubben, ValueAct Capital
- Steven Romick, First Pacific Advisors
- David Nierenberg, The D3 Family Funds
- Rahul Saraogi, Atyant Capital (India)
- Michael Kao, Akanthos Capital Management
- Ori Eyal, Emerging Value Capital Management
- Kian Ghazi, Hawkshaw Capital Management
- Guy Gottfried, Relational Investment Group
- Whitney Tilson & Glenn Tongue, T2 Partners

Here's a rare chance to get the latest market thoughts and investment ideas from hedge fund managers. It's also a great chance to network and talk stocks with other analysts and portfolio managers attending the event. Click here to register for the Value Investing Congress.

Michael Steinhardt on Differences Between Past & Current Hedge Funds

Michael Steinhardt founded Steinhardt Partners in 1967 and generated 24% average annual returns over a 28 year period. He was one of the true pioneers in the industry and he recently sat down with CNBC for an interview.

The former titan talked about his time as a hedge fund manager, saying "When I was doing it, it was an elite phenomenon. Now it ain't an elite business anymore." Steinhardt is now the chairman of ETF firm, WisdomTree.

Hedge Fund Differences: Then & Now

Performance: He notes that the main difference between hedge funds then and now is the goal of performance. He targeted (and achieved) outsized returns, while many funds today are happy cranking out "only" 12-14% gains.

Assets Under Management (AUM): Steinhardt also slipped in his signature phrase of 'diseconomies of scale,' referring to the fact that as assets under management (AUM) grew, true outperformance was harder to achieve. He chastised modern hedge funds as asset gathering behemoths with goals of making money from the assets (management fee) rather than making money from performance.

Impact of Fund Size on Returns: This is a big talking point amongst investors, especially as of late it seems. The classic example, of course, is John Paulson. His hedge fund Paulson & Co catapulted to fame with his stellar returns shorting subprime. As his AUM has swelled, investors have raised concern and Paulson addressed his fund size in his year-end letter.

Maverick Capital's hedge fund founder Lee Ainslie also wrote a quarterly letter to refute the notion that large fund size negatively impacts a manager's ability to generate returns.

Steinhardt's point (and it's a good one), is that regardless of whether or not these funds generate performance, the funds are still making money due to the management fee on a sizable chunk of assets.

Hedge Fund Herding: The hedge fund legend also points out that so many managers are using similar strategies these days, whereas he was one of the few employing them in his time. This is yet another topic that high profile funds have been forced to address via investor letters. Viking Global's Andreas Halvorsen wrote about hedge fund herding here (scroll down in the post).

In short, Steinhardt raises some valid points about how hedge funds have slightly strayed from their original incarnation. The reason? Money, of course.

He's not alone in his concern, either. After all, so many prominent funds wouldn't have to address such issues had they not seen continuous signs of concern from their investors.

You can watch Steinhardt's interview below where he also gives his macro outlook and oddly enough goes on a tirade against Warren Buffett (email readers come to the site to watch):



In the video, Steinhardt also briefly mentions that he remains short 2 year Treasuries. You can also read his past thoughts on why he thinks treasuries are foolish.

T2 Partners Attributes Poor Performance to Contrarianism

Whitney Tilson and Glenn Tongue's hedge fund T2 Partners sent out a monthly update to investors and they reveal performance of -4.3% in March and -3.1% for the year. This trails the S&P 500, which is up 5.9% in 2011. More interesting than the performance figures, though, is the the notion of deviating from the herd and its subsequent effect on that performance.

T2 writes that, "a bigger reason for our underperformance, especially last month, is our investment strategy, which is rooted in deviating from the crowd with contrarian bets. It's the only way to outperform the market over the long term, but it also carries with it the risk - indeed, the certainty - that there will be periods during which one underperforms the market."

Obsession With Short-Term Performance

This is worth pointing out because Wall Street and investors are seemingly always fixated on short-term performance. In part, this is one of the reasons that Shumway Capital Partners returned outside investor capital (among many other reasons). In his letter, Chris Shumway noted that returning outsider money would allow him to focus on long-term positioning that he has been so successful with.

When investors place monthly expectations on a manager, rather than yearly ones, the manager is pressured to attain short-term performance and it compromises their core investment strategy.

Value Versus Global Macro Managers

To illustrate this point, we turn to a comparison between value-based investors and global macro traders. If a macro manager sees a mountain top (gains from a potential trade), he will go after it. However, if he encounters a valley (temporary loss of capital) on the way to the mountain top, he will pivot and trade around that position to eliminate near-term risk or even profit from the decline by temporarily shorting.

A value-based manager, on the other hand, will continue to hold their long position and ride out the valley (decline) in order to get to the mountain top (gain). Their deeply rooted stance makes them more prone to near-term underperformance.

T2's Letter

In the recent past, T2 Partners has blamed poor performance on their short positions. Yet despite covering their short of Netflix (NFLX), they puzzlingly held onto other valuation shorts like Opentable (OPEN) and Lululemon (LULU), but that's a whole 'nother conversation.

Now they are attributing poor performance to contrarianism. Some will undoubtedly say this is just excuse after excuse and wonder what the fund will blame next. Putting that aside, T2 does underline a prescient point worth extracting: sometimes it's painful to be contrarian.

In the letter, T2 goes on to highlight that, "it's easy to deviate from the crowd, of course, but it's much harder to be right - and even harder to be right on the timing."

If a value investor can stomach the near-term anguish (and assuming their thesis is proven correct), they'll make it to that mountain top eventually. T2 gives an example of this with their investment in Iridium (IRDM). While they think the stock is a triple in 3-5 years, they have to hang on through the bumpy ride in the near-term as last month the stock was down 15.1% and the warrants dropped 24.1%.

T2's run of poor performance continues and you can read their take on the situation embedded below in their investor letter (email readers need to come to the site to view it):



For more on that particular stock, head to T2's analysis of Iridium.

Hedge Fund Third Point Reduces Net Long Exposure: Latest Positioning

Dan Loeb's hedge fund firm Third Point LLC has released its March performance and exposure report. Third Point returned 0.9% in March and is up 8.6% year to date versus 5.9% for the S&P 500. Third Point's Offshore Fund now has an annualized return of 19%.

Latest Exposure Levels

Third Point is net long equities to the tune of 42.2%. This is a decrease of 14%, down from last month's 56.2% net long exposure. As various crises (risk) around the world escalated, Third Point has ratcheted their exposure down. In Loeb's year-end letter, he voiced that he was concerned about the consensus bullish view.

Third Point's largest net exposure is in energy, basic materials, and consumer. In credit, Third Point is 17.1% net long asset backed securities (RMBS & CMBS exposure), 11.5% net long distressed, 6.1% net long performing and -5.1% short government securities. Their credit allocations are largely unchanged from last month.

Third Point's Top Positions:

1. Gold
2. Delphi Corp
3. Chrysler
4. El Paso Corp (EP)
5. NXP Semiconductor (NXPI) ~ multiple securities held

In February, we highlighted how Loeb started El Paso as a new position and it remains one of their top holdings. This month, their exposure to NXP Semiconductor (NXPI) replaces LyondellBasell (LYB) as their fifth largest position.

NXPI is a prime player in the NFC (near field communications) space that seems to be sweeping the mobile industry as interest in mobile payments heats up. The company recently priced a secondary offering at $30 per share and has been doing a roadshow to drum up investor interest. This offering significantly helps liquidity in the stock and should allow larger hedge funds to accumulate positions.

Top Winners & Losers for Third Point

We get a glimpse at some of Third Point's other positions with their top winners from the month, including: CVR Energy (CVI), Short A, Statoil Fuel & Retail ASA (SFR), Aveta, and Health Net (HNET). Their top losing positions for the month include Potash (POT), PHH Corp (multiple securities held), Inmarsat, ProSieben (multiple securities held), and El Paso.

To see analysis of Loeb's portfolio and the investment thesis behind some of his picks, check out our Hedge Fund Wisdom newsletter.

Bill Ackman Starts Activist Position in Alexander & Baldwin (ALEX)

Bill Ackman's hedge fund firm Pershing Square has initiated a new activist position in Alexander & Baldwin (ALEX). Per a 13D filed with the SEC, Pershing has disclosed a 8.6% ownership stake in ALEX with 3,561,943 shares due to portfolio activity on March 21st. This comes after Ackman's other activist position in J.C. Penney (JCP) as well as his stake in Fortune Brands (FO).

Not a New Position?

While this appears to be a brand new position, Pershing also filed an amended 13F for the fourth quarter of 2010. And guess what all of a sudden appears? Shares of ALEX. At 2010 year-end, Ackman's hedge fund actually owned 172,001 shares. This position was previously unreported on their last 13F filing because they filed with the disclaimer of "confidential information has been omitted from this report and filed separately with the Commission."

Ackman obviously did this in order to stealthily accumulate his position. Because let's face it, had he been forced to disclose the tiny new position back in February, the imitators who mimic his every move would have seen this new position and driven prices. Pershing accumulated most of their stake in March. To see the rest of Pershing's investments, head to our Hedge Fund Wisdom newsletter.

Working With Marcato Capital Again

Also worth highlighting in Pershing's new activist stake is the fact that they will be working with fellow hedge fund Marcato Capital again. Marcato was founded by ex-Pershing analyst Mick McGuire and he had previously recommended shares of Landry's Restaurants to Pershing and the two worked together on the activist position.

They've teamed up again on shares of Alexander & Baldwin and Marcato owns 1.3% of ALEX with 551,881 shares. Collectively, the two hedge fund firms together now own 9.9% of the company. Their average purchase price seems to be around $41.xx per share given they spent $168.8 million on the stake.

Additionally, the hedge fund firms have exposure to 372,900 shares via total return swaps. These have a price of $45.12 per share and their ownership stake inclusive of these jumps to around 11% of the company. Overall, the SEC filings contain the standard activist boilerplate regarding talking to management about enhancing shareholder value. We'll have to see what tricks Ackman and McGuire have up their collective activist sleeves.

Per Google Finance, Alexander & Baldwin is "engaged in property development and agribusiness operations. The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary Matson Navigation Company, Inc., together with its two subsidiaries, is engaged in ocean transportation operations, related shoreside operations in Hawaii, and intermodal, truck brokerage and logistics services. The Company operates in five segments in three industries: Transportation, Real Estate and Agribusiness."

To learn more about this hedge fund, check out our profile of Pershing Square.

Eton Park Reduces Airgas (ARG) Position

Eric Mindich's hedge fund firm Eton Park Capital has reduced its stake in Airgas (ARG). Due to an amended 13D filing with the SEC, Eton Park now shows a 4.92% ownership stake in ARG with 4,145,191 shares due to portfolio activity on March 29th.

This is a 31% reduction in their position size. Back in December 2010, Eton Park owned 7.15% of Airgas. The bulk of their recent sales came on February 16th and March 30th at weighted average prices of $63.0019 and $66.3244, respectively.

You'll recall that Airgas had in the past been subject to a takeover bid by Air Products (APD). Eton Park had supported the bid after APD raised its offer numerous times. However, Airgas did not seem receptive. For now, Eton Park still holds a position, albeit a smaller one than previous months.

Per Google Finance, Airgas is "a distributor of industrial, medical and specialty gases (delivered in packaged or cylinder form), and hardgoods, such as welding equipment and supplies."

Viking Global Increases H&R Block (HRB) Stake

Andreas Halvorsen's hedge fund Viking Global has boosted its stake in H&R Block (HRB). Per a 13G filed with the SEC, Viking has disclosed a 5.5% ownership stake in HRB with 16,664,422 shares. This is a 60% increase in their position size as they owned 10,408,200 shares at the end of 2010.

The firm has been taking more concentrated positions as each portfolio manager essentially owns each other's "best ideas". Before founding Viking, Halvorsen worked at Julian Robertson's Tiger Management. You can see the rest of Viking Global's portfolio here.

Per Google Finance, H&R Block is "has subsidiaries that provide tax, banking, and business and consulting services. The Company’s Tax Services segment provides income tax return preparation, electronic filing and other services and products related to income tax return preparation to the general public primarily in the United States, and also in Canada and Australia."

What We're Reading ~ 4/1/10

Evaluating equity investments: Accounting for Value [Stephen Penman]

Famed subprime short-seller Michael Burry's FCIC testimony [ValueWalk]

AIG's mistake explained [Economics of Contempt]

How Verizon could purchase Sprint and harm Vodafone [Cautious Bull]

Bill Ackman speaking at Make A Difference in Milwaukee on April 27th

Bridgewater, Elliott & SAC shape report on long-term investing [AR+Alpha]

More on Chinese reverse mergers [CNBC]

GGP, HHC, The Wall Street Journal and David Simon [ValuePlays]

What hedge fund managers know about making money [Marketwatch]

Managed account platform assets grow by 27% [HFMWeek]

Hedge funds may salvage month despite quake [WSJ]

Short linkfest this week. For more good financial reads, head to Abnormal Returns