Summary of Great Investors' Best Ideas Conference (GIBI) Dallas 2018

The 2018 Great Investors' Best Ideas (GIBI) Dallas Conference recently concluded with proceeds benefiting The Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research and the Vickery Meadow Youth Development Foundation.  Here's a brief summary of the event:


Great Investors Best Ideas Dallas Conference 2018


Lee Ainslie (Maverick Capital) talked with Lee Hobson (Highside Capital) about quantitative investing and utilizing its features to replicate various typical fundamental processes: screening companies, position sizing, data sets.  Maverick has been focused on the intersection of man and machine, instead of simply one versus the other.  Didn't pitch any individual names.  Maverick has launched four quant funds over the past few years that have higher turnover, in addition to their fundamental hedge fund.


Jim Grant (Grant's Interest Rate Observer):  Likes municipal closed end fund BlackRock Investment Quality Municipal Trust (BKN), says trading at 13% discount.  Also recommended shorting Matthews International (MATW) due to aggressive accounting, as well as fighting secular trends like the shift to cremation.


Ray Nixon Jr (Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss): Pitched General Electric (GE), sees valuation around $12 on a sum of the parts basis.  Obviously there's been a lot of volatility in this name.


Lisa Hess (SkyTop Capital): Bullish on the electric vehicle shift.  Pitched Sherritt International debt: 7.875% 2025, as well as Aumann in Germany, a copper coil play.  Also mentioned that Tesla (TSLA) is a religion, not a stock.


Michael Price (MFP Investors):  Bullish on AT&T (T) as well as Intel (INTC).


Marc Cohodes (Former Managing Director of Copper River Management):  Negative on MiMedx Group (MDXG).  Also mentioned Intec Pharma (NTEC) as a long.


Richard Mashaal (Senvest Management): Paramount Resources (Canadian E&P), sees a double or triple in next 1-1.5 years.  Cited increased production and hidden assets as reasons for bullishness, also thinks multiple could re-rate.


Ken Hersh (George W. Bush Presidential Center):  e-Sports is a huge business in early innings.  Sees 280 million fans going to 550 million in next 4-5 years.  Plays on the trend include Amazon (AMZN) due to their ownership of streaming platform Twitch, game maker Activision Blizzard (ATVI), and graphics card maker nVidia (NVDA).


Roger Staubach (Former Executive Chairman JLL Americas):  "Adversity reveals genius and prosperity conceals it."


Stay tuned in the next few weeks as we'll be covering a ton of investment conferences.

What We're Reading ~ 9/8/16

In-depth pitch on Liberty Global Latin America (LILA/K) [Find Me Value]

A second look at Amerco (UHAL) [Punch Card Research]

WD-40 (WDFC): a case study of the bubble in 'safe' stocks [Intrinsic Investing]

Analysis of Dell Technologies new VMWare tracking stock [Clark Street Value]

Morris Mark on four stocks he likes [Barrons]

Uber: from zero to seventy billion [Economist]

Google, Uber and the evolution of transportation [Stratechery]

Why electric cars will be here sooner than you think [WSJ]

How Apple's car could crack the automotive industry [Autocar]

Old article on capital allocator Henry Singleton [BrianLangis]

A look at the online travel industry [Phocuswright]

Why walking helps us think [New Yorker]

Inside Dyson's reinvention factory [Forbes]

Will Amazon kill FedEx and UPS? [Bloomberg]

On subscription retail [The Robin Report]

Theranos: how Elizabeth Holmes's house of cards fell [Vanity Fair]

Is Gamestop (GME) a Value Play or Value Trap? Quick Pitch

Market Folly has been adding a bunch of new features as of late. We started off with our stock of the week series and now we're going to begin a monthly 'quick pitch' on certain equities that hedge funds have been long or short.

Today's quick pitch focuses on Gamestop (GME): Value Play or Value Trap? The following is from Chris Lau, a SeekingAlpha contributor:

A major shake-up in the way games are distributed is unfolding. Activision (ATVI) and EA’s (EA) entrance in digital gaming is proving to be a winning strategy. EA’s online site, Origin, bypasses traditional sales channels. In the social networking space, Zynga’s (ZNGA) IPO showed investor willingness to take risks. Investors are putting money in the yet-to-be proven model of social networking games.

This leaves one major question: What does this mean for retailers like GameStop?


Hedge Fund Ownership (Or Lack Thereof)

The top holders of GME stock are largely vanilla mutual fund players like Vanguard and Fidelity. While Cliff Assness' quant firm AQR Capital owned a decently sized position as of 2011 year-end, there is practically no major hedge fund ownership in this stock (at least in the top 100 holders).


GameStop Backstory

GameStop has grown throughout the years, and especially after its acquisition of Electronic Boutique in 2005 for $1.44B. In the last few years as the digital downloading of games has proliferated, GameStop touted its knowledge of gaming and its consumers as a competitive advantage.

In recent months, investor pessimism has grown. Shares are 22.91% off from 52-week highs, closing recently at $21.70. The main concern lies in the rising shift to digital gaming from the traditional physical console games.

GameStop has tried to attack this shift head-on and saw over $450 million in digital sales last year. They've mainly offered access codes in stores that allow gamers to download content at home. GME was originally spun-off from Barnes in Noble (BKS) in 2002, yet another company battling digital distribution of content.

GME's management team has set aside money for further acquisitions in digital as they have cash and no debt.


Valuation

At $21.95 per share, GME trades at a P/E of 7.63 (using 2011 EPS of $2.87 that excludes write-downs). By comparison, Best Buy (BBY) traded recently at $22.95 with a P/E of 6.30 (using 2011 EPS of $3.64).


Why the Bulls Own the Stock

Bulls point to fears over digital distribution as being overblown and argue that the digital transition will take longer to play out and won't cripple GME. They feel as though GME has a dominant market position in the industry.

Joel Greenblatt of Gotham Capital runs a Compustat screen to create a 'Value 1000' index for value investors. GME is one of the main companies on that list due to its cheap valuation. Other bulls might point to a cap structure strategy and its cashflow story as compelling reasons to own it. The massive repurchases could potentially place a floor on the stock that can keep shares buoyant even if things take a turn for the worse. And given the high short interest, there's also potential for various short squeezes as these buybacks reduce the float size.

- During the last quarter, GME grew market share to record levels.
- Its expertise allowed the company to create new business models to fill profitability gap
- PowerUp Rewards program (launched October 2010) now has over 17 million members
- Pre-owned digital and mobile business will add $800 million in revenue in 2012
- The company is debt-free
- $500 million stock buyback
- Cheap valuation
- Continued partnerships with publishers to sell DLC


Why the Bears Are Short

Bears will argue that a secular shift to digital distribution of games and the rise of social gaming will lead to the demise of GME ala Blockbuster.

Hedge fund manager Jim Chanos of Kynikos Associates is a notable bear on GME shares as he argues that game publishers like EA are increasingly becoming direct competitors with GME. You can view his bearish presentation on GME here.

He argues that GME looks cheap and will appear cheap all the way down. Just like movies and music, Chanos says that the value of their brick and mortar presence will collapse. GME's counterpart in the UK, Game Group, recently filed for protection from creditors.

And while GME currently thrives on used game sales, that revenue stream could be in jeopardy in the future. It's been rumored that future iterations of Microsoft's Xbox and Sony's Playstation will likely have some sort of "anti-used games measures" built in to the consoles.

One risk that short sellers are cognizant of is that GME could potentially take themselves private or be taken over by private equity. Additionally, the cost to borrow is quite expensive due to the crowded short.

- Fewer packaged game titles are being released
- Short interest has climbed to 41%
- In its recent quarter, GME said physical console category declined faster than projected
- Comparable store sales dropped 3.6% in the last quarter
- 20% decline in hardware sales


Further Talking Points

During the company's recent quarterly conference call, management said that digital receipts are ahead of schedule. They have a goal of $1.5b receipts by 2014.

GameStop's recommerce (buy-sell-trade) for mobile devices, electronics, and tablets started in 2011. The company believes it can resell items like Apple iPads, assuming 5% trade-ins annually and a 12-18 month upgrade cycle. Sales would account for $200m by 2012 and $600m by 2014 which you can read about here.

GME forecasts growth that is reliant on physical games, hardware, and software. The short-term problem for the company is that a lack of new consoles in 2012 will pressure margins. GME's loyalty program must attract a higher proportion of digital sales.

Hot titles like Grand Theft Auto, FIFA Soccer, Call of Duty, and Max Payne 3 may be a catalyst for higher growth. These catalysts aren't necessarily reflected in the current share price and management kept only a conservative forecast for these releases.


Conclusion

GameStop (GME) is a company that dominates in its traditional space of selling physical video games, but it needs to grow-up in the digital world and faces challenges in adaptation. The negative price action in its stock as well as competitors (BBY), suggests that there is further downside. If console makers implement anti-used game measures, GME would have a tough uphill battle. Weak retail sales in electronics and heavy competition make this a stock to avoid at this time.


Thanks to Chris Lau for his contribution to Market Folly in our new 'Quick Pitch' series. If you have an investment write-up you'd like to submit, please click here to email us

Carl Icahn Ramps Up Take-Two Interactive Stake (TTWO)

Well known investor and 'corporate raider' Carl Icahn has filed a 13D with the SEC for his hedge fund Icahn Partners. In it, Icahn discloses a 11.28% ownership stake in Take-Two Interactive Software (TTWO). The filing was made due to activity on December 17th, 2009 and they now own 9,158,479 shares (including underlying call options).

Direct from the SEC filing, here is a breakdown of the prices at which Icahn bought shares and calls on TTWO through his various investment funds:

(click to enlarge)

(click to enlarge)

The majority of their purchase was common stock, however they also purchased 783,479 shares through call options that expire December 16th, 2011 and they have sold European-style put options for the same amount of shares with the same expiry. This is not a new position for Icahn because as of September 30th (per his latest 13F filing), he owned 2,007,445 shares. This means that in the last three months, Icahn has purchased an additional 7,151,034 shares, a 356% increase over their previous stake.

Icahn has filed a 13D which signifies his activist intentions with his stake. And, given Icahn's rabblerousing ways, we'd expect nothing less. His filing claims that he feels shares are undervalued and that he might seek to talk with management. Many analysts believe that Icahn's entrance into such a name means that TTWO will most likely become an acquisition target again as it had previously been subject to advances from fellow gaming firms like Electronic Arts (ERTS).

Carl Icahn runs hedge fund Icahn Partners and focuses on activist investing where he seeks to implement change at various companies. We've covered his movements in-depth here on the blog and in October he laid out the idea to short real estate. In addition, we've also detailed some of his portfolio activity. For investing insight from Carl Icahn, check out his guest lecture at Yale.

Taken from Google Finance, Take Two Interactive is "a global publisher, developer and distributor of interactive entertainment software, hardware and accessories. The Company operates in two segments: publishing and distribution. The publishing segment consists of Rockstar Games, 2K Games, 2K Sports and 2K Play publishing labels. The Company develops, markets and publishes software titles for gaming and entertainment hardware platforms, including Sony’s PLAYSTATION3 (PS3) and PlayStation2 (PS2) computer entertainment systems; Sony’s PSP (PlayStationPortable) (PSP) system; Microsoft’s Xbox 360 (Xbox 360) video game and entertainment system; Nintendo’s Wii (Wii) and DS (DS) systems, and for the personal computers (PC) and Games for Windows. The Company’s distribution segment, which includes its Jack of All Games subsidiary, distributes its products, as well as software, hardware and accessories produced by others to retail outlets in North America."

Activision (ATVI): A Bright Light in the Dark Consumer World?

I am long a specialty retail play. I had to slap myself out of the stupor for owning one in an environment I have dubbed as a consumer recession. What am I long? Well, how about some Activision Blizzard (ATVI). I was fortunate/unfortunate enough (we'll know later) to get filled on some of my orders in the $10.xx region and I had a few more orders down in the $9.xx that did not get filled.

So, why am I long a retail name, much less a specialty retail name. Well, first and foremost, it is mainly as a hedge to some of my other retail shorts. So, let's make that abundantly clear. I am bearish on the consumer and the economy. But, such bearishness must be given protection to any rampant rallies that might occur and I've selected ATVI, as they are currently dominating competitors such as Electronic Arts (ERTS) and THQ (THQI).

Secondly, I would propose that video games are by no means recession resistant, but they are less affected by a recession than other types of specialty retail. Why? Gamers are hardcore. Many are addicts. A game costs a measly $40-60 bucks and gives you hours upon hours of entertainment. And, ATVI has some of the best titles out there right now, including the Guitar Hero franchise, Call of Duty (4th installment out for the holidays), World of Warcraft (new expansion pack out for the holidays), among many others. They offer relatively cheap products and this benefits them in an environment where the consumer is struggling. When that new game hits, most people gotta have it, especially if its an installment in an already proven franchise such as the games mentioned above.

Thirdly, in addition to the strong products set to hit for the holiday season, ATVI has some very highly anticipated games in the pipeline for the future as well. If anyone is a fan of Blizzard's games (now a part of Activision Blizzard), then you already know what I'm talking about: Diablo 3 and Starcraft 2. These are highly proven franchises and are long awaited sequels (especially Starcraft 2). The entire nation of Korea will probably pick up a copy of SC2, I'm not even kidding. The game's prequel, Starcraft, was that big of a hit over there. So, future revenue streams are well in place.

Fourthly, even in a weak consumer environment, ATVI was still able to deliver solid earnings and stick to their forecast. And, they even announced plans to buy-back $1 billion of stock. After all, they have $3 billion in cash. Some takeaways from the quarter,

"For the September quarter, Activision Blizzard had two of the top-10 titles in dollars on all console platforms in the U.S., according to The NPD Group. For the September quarter, Activision Blizzard had two of the top-five PC titles worldwide -- Blizzard Entertainment's World of Warcraft: Battle Chest(R) and Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare, according to Charttrack, Gfk and The NPD Group."

And, some data from the recent quarter courtesy of Barron's Tech Trader Daily,

"For the quarter, the video game company posted non-GAAP revenue of $770 million, well ahead of the company’s previous forecast of $620 million. ATVI posted non-GAAP EPS of 7 cents a share, better than the company’s forecast of 4 cents. For Q4, the company sees non-GAAP revenue of $2.2 billion, with profits of 29 cents a share."

So, as you can see, the company is holding up fine so far in this environment. Yes, the consumer should theoretically weaken as we move forward, but ATVI has solid titles, is selling cheaper items, and is selling to a consumer who is not likely to give up their products, despite the recession. If you want any evidence that ATVI has a comparative advantage in titles, then simply compare ATVI's most recent quarter to rival THQ's quarter. Yea, that wasn't pretty.

Lastly, I want to highlight that $10 billion hedge fund Caxton Associates ran by Bruce Kovner was out adding ATVI as a new position in their portfolio last quarter. And, not only did they just 'add it,' they really loaded up. They brought it up all the way to their 3rd largest portfolio holding. I wrote about Caxton's purchase earlier, where I detailed their portfolio holdings. Caxton is one of the many hedge funds I track on Marketfolly.com.

ATVI is best of breed in the gaming space and I am happy to be long the name as a hedge to my other specialty retail shorts. (See my post on the deteriorating consumer environment for short ideas). But, more importantly, the company definitely has a bright near-term future with all the anxiously awaited titles they have lined up.

I would be remiss if I did not end this piece with a 'proceed with caution' label. Specialty retail is easily going to be the hardest hit in the retail space. This is simply going to be a case of "who loses the least." If you do not want to take on the risk involved with this name, I would highly suggest checking out cheap retail plays on the "trading down" of the consumer to cheaper alternatives. These names include the masters of the cheap domain: Walmart (WMT) and McDonalds (MCD). And, you can read my thoughts about MCD's dominance here. Apart from those, playing retail names from the long side will be a very uphill battle.