Long/Short Equity Hedge Funds Shift From Growth To Value Stocks

As per Bank of America Merrill Lynch's latest hedge fund monitor report, we see that 2010 is off to a flying start. Hedge funds have started the year strong performance wise and were out buying equities and commodities. This comes after hedge funds returned over 17% in 2009, a polar opposite of their return in 2008. Back in December 2009 we noted that hedge funds were very long equities and that trend has continued as trades taken so far this year include extending their net long position in equities, moving further into crowded longs in crude oil and the US dollar, as well as continuing to hold yield curve steepeners. While PIMCO's Bill Gross has offered up an explanation for why the stock market was up 70+% last year, we know that all the buying by hedge funds certainly didn't hurt either.

Hedge Fund Long & Short Positions

Taking a look at the largest long positions, we see that the hedge fund universe as a whole are very long the Nasdaq (NDX), gold, crude oil, heating oil, and the US dollar. Shifting to their short positions, they are bearish on natural gas, the euro, as well as 10 & 30 year treasuries. The bearish sentiment on treasuries and their wager against them via yield curve steepeners is by no means new. We've covered this trade extensively for quite some time. One of the original hedgies Michael Steinhardt himself has called treasuries foolish. Legendary investor and ex-Quantum fund manager Jim Rogers shares this sentiment and dislikes treasuries. Hedge fund legend Julian Robertson is betting on higher interest rates and is doing so via constant maturity swaps (CMS). We could go on, but the point is that many prominent hedge funds have been in this play for a while now.

Let's now shift to specific hedge fund strategies. We typically like to focus on stockpicking hedge funds here at Market Folly since they're the easiest to track. However, below we'll cover exposure levels of market neutral funds, long/short hedge funds, as well as global macro hedge funds.

Market Neutral

Hedge funds employing a market neutral strategy have kept market exposure flat (appropriately). They have been tilting towards growth names and high quality stocks. As it pertains to inflation, they have neutral expectations. Overall, market neutral funds are neutral equities and have been moving toward higher quality names.

Long/Short

Hedge funds in the long/short domain have brought their exposure levels back up to 'average' levels as they are now around 36-37% net long. Contrary to their market neutral fund colleagues, long/short funds as a whole have recently favored value stocks, buying both large caps and 'low quality' names. As it pertains to inflation, they have positive inflationary expectations. The main takeaway here is that l/s funds have shifted from growth names to value names.

Global Macro

Global macro hedge funds often move in and out of positions much more frequently so keep that in mind. To start the year, these funds were buying the S&P 500 (SPX/SPY) and selling the Nasdaq (NDX). They held their net long positions in commodities but have continued to cover shorts in the US dollar. These funds also aggressively sold emerging markets as they reduced their stake in this crowded long. Again touching on the treasuries trade, we see that global macro funds were adding to their shorts in the 10 year treasury last week. The chart below again emphasizes the various hedge fund positions in treasuries:

(click to enlarge)

This trade has become awfully drawn out and could be due for a breather. For those of you still interested in learning how to replicate this play though, head to this post on curve steepeners.

That wraps up our coverage of hedge fund exposure levels for now. For more research as to what the smart money is investing in, check out the top 10 stocks held by hedge funds, as well as 10 investment themes for 2010.

Hedge Fund Short Positions: High Operating Leverage the Common Theme

Upon reading various hedge fund investor letters and conversing with colleagues in the industry, one thing has become quite clear: hedge funds got their asses kicked on the short side of the portfolio in 2009. This is by no means a shocking revelation given that the stock market itself has risen over 70% from the lows back in March 2009. After all, a rising tide seems to lift all boats. While the negative performance of short positions over the past year is a common trend, we want to focus on a theme found in many of their portfolios.

Here's the common link: many hedge funds have shorted businesses with high operating leverage. Amidst the crisis of the past two years, operating and financial leverage became quite a detriment to various companies. Hedge funds quickly recognized this and shorted shares of companies who would struggle with this burden in an uncertain economic climate. At the time, it was a poignant move. However, markets are often driven by perception (versus reality).

What are we talking about here?

We're simply pointing out that the high operating leverage that was once seen as a detriment to the companies that hedge funds were/are shorting can now be construed as an attribute. According to the market, the economy is recovering and things are slowly but surely getting better. (More appropriately, the markets have been the beneficiary of massive capital inflows). Regardless, this market rebound re-instills confidence and shifts investor sentiment. And, most importantly, it reverses risk tolerance.

The very companies investors avoided like the plague during the crisis are now catching a bid because investors' risk tolerance has returned. Many hedge funds missed this swing in perception and bore the brunt of the blow. It doesn't matter right now if the company could potentially have problems due to their operating leverage. Right now, all that matters is that risk tolerance has returned and risk is 'in'. This goes back to the age old market debate of perception versus reality.

We can't tell you how many times we've seen hedge funds comment on the 'mistakes' they made in 2009. Almost all of their mistakes are on the short side of the portfolio. And while they don't name specific stocks, they mention the sectors and attributes of their shorts. Many of their errors have come from shorting companies with high operating leverage that rallied furiously ahead of the rest of the market. While hedge funds were bound to take losses on the short side of their books because they had to be short something in this monster rally, it's interesting to note that the vast majority of their mistakes boil down to companies with that same common link. Looking back, it's a bit of a 'captain obvious' moment.

Andreas Halvorsen's hedge fund Viking Global started feeling the pain from their shorts as early as the second quarter. Chase Coleman's hedge fund Tiger Global had problems with their short positions as early as the first quarter 2009. Many of these hedge funds were (and still are) shorting banks, REITs, luxury hotel chains, and capital goods companies (industrials).

More than anything, this just reiterates the fact that caution must be exercised when shorting companies with high operating leverage. Arguably even more important, this showcases that it pays to monitor market perception and investor risk tolerance. Many hedge funds absorbed the initial ramp higher in their short positions but eventually entered the house of pain as they stood by their conviction. This is why sometimes you have to pay attention to more than just fundamentals.

It's interesting to look back on this now and see such a common theme. As we like to say: the opportunities clear in retrospect are often unclear in prospect. Still though, some will argue that 2009 was bound to be a losing year on the short side regardless of the companies targeted simply because you were fighting an uphill battle... against the government's $1.5 trillion blank check.

John Paulson Discloses SuperMedia (SPMD) Position

John Paulson's hedge fund firm Paulson & Co has just filed a 13D with the SEC and has disclosed a 17.4% ownership stake in SuperMedia (SPMD). The filing was made due to activity on December 31st, 2009 and they now own 2,607,506 shares. This is a newly disclosed stake for them as they did not show share ownership of SPMD when we previously looked at Paulson's portfolio. SuperMedia is the new name for Idearc, who recently emerged from bankruptcy.

Their position in SuperMedia does require some explanation as they didn't just solely purchase shares. Taken direct from the SEC filing, we see that "A total of $12,117,456 was paid to acquire shares pursuant to the Standby Purchase Agreement. Additionally, the Reporting Persons (Paulson) paid a total of $455,895,831 for debt securities of the Issuer (SPMD) that was exchanged for cash, new debt securities of the Issuer and shares of Common Stock pursuant to the First Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization with the United States Bankruptcy Court."

So, we now see that back on November 18th, 2009 Paulson entered into a Standby Purchase Agreement. Paulson also entered into a Standstill Agreement whereby he can nominate one board director as long as his firm owns at least 20% of the outstanding shares. Paulson's potential ownership of common stock has also been limited to 45% of the outstanding shares and this agreement has a four year term.

Of the 2,607,506 shares Paulson owns, 4.7% of those are common shares purchased under the Standby Purchase Agreement and 12.7% of those shares were acquired upon the exchange of debt securities pursuant to the Plan. Got all that? For more information on Idearc's emergence from bankruptcy as the new SuperMedia, head to this press release.

This latest portfolio movement comes amongst the recent fanfare surrounding John Paulson's new gold fund which we covered extensively. Paulson of course has gained notoriety for his huge bet against subprime over the past few years where he made billions. Wall Street Journal columnist Gregory Zuckerman has detailed Paulson's amazing play in his new book The Greatest Trade Ever (see our review here).

Other recent portfolio activity out of hedge fund Paulson & Co includes doubling down on their Cadbury stake (CBY) and taking a position in Conseco (CNO). For more insight from Paulson, check out their third quarter investor letter. Lastly, you can also view the rest of John Paulson's equity holdings here.

Taken from Google Finance, SuperMedia (formerly Idearc Inc.) "serves as the advertising agency for small-to-medium sized businesses with a variety of advertising solutions."

Raymond James' Strategist Jeff Saut: Watch the US Dollar

Jeffrey Saut, Chief Investment Strategist for Raymond James is back with his weekly market commentary. This week's investment strategy entitled, "Predictions?!" focuses on Saut's commentary about recent economic data and things to watch for this year.

As it pertains to the markets, Saut says, "Dynamically, participants should still be long half of the index trading positions recommended months ago, but with close trailing stop-loss points. Strategically, we think it is appropriate to hedge, or harvest, partial positions in the investment account." We would agree with him here because not only are we proponents of running a hedged book, but it never hurts to lock in some gains or protect them with stop-loss triggers.

Turning his focus to new investments, Saut highlighted three specific stocks taken from their Analysts' Best Picks list. From that list, he singled out shares of CVS Caremark (CVS), National Oilwell Varco (NOV), and Alpha Natural Resources (ANR) as stocks they think will perform well.

Lastly, Saut points out that the rally in the US dollar has been a major development since it was such a swift and large move. However, the dollar has since weakened a little bit and money has started to flow into "stuff" stocks (i.e. commodities). He notes that if the recent weakness in the dollar is a 'headfake' and if the dollar strengthens again that, "it has significant implications for the various markets." We'll have to wait and see what develops in that regard. You can download Saut's full investment strategy via .pdf here.

For more from Jeff Saut, check out his 2010 market outlook as well as his commentary from last week, 'lessons learned.'

Regulators Seek To Throw Light On Hedge Fund Impact In Energy Trading

The following is a guest post from Darrell Delamaide for OilPrice.com:



Do hedge funds have an impact on energy trading?

While the answer might seem intuitive, the debate as to whether they actually do has come to resemble the medieval theological dispute about how many angels can dance on the head of the pin.

Because, like angels, many trades in energy futures are invisible, and it is often not possible to pinpoint where they take place.

And yet, for most of us, including lawmakers on Capitol Hill, it seems obvious that when hedge funds buy and sell billions of dollars worth of oil and gas futures, it must be having an impact on energy prices. While hedge funds and other speculative traders would never dream of taking delivery of a barrel of oil, their trading activity affects the prices for actual consumers of oil and gas and their downstream customers – or so it would seem.

When Gary Gensler, a former Goldman Sachs banker and Treasury Department official, was nominated last year as chairman of the Commodity Futures and Trading Commission – the chief regulator for energy futures trading – he reversed the CFTC party line that speculators don’t have an impact on energy trading.

“I believe that excessive speculation in commodity futures can cause sudden or unreasonable fluctuations or unwarranted changes in commodity prices,” Gensler said in a written response to lawmakers’ questions ahead of his nomination hearing.

Gensler went on to pledge that if confirmed, he would have the CFTC guard against such speculation.

While he stopped short of saying that excessive speculation had taken place in the run-up of energy prices in 2008, he did express the opinion that the rapid growth of commodity index funds and increased hedge fund allocation to commodity assets contributed to the “bubble in commodities prices that peaked in mid-2008.”

He noted that non-commercial investors sometimes account for up to 90% of open interest in a contract. (Open interest is a calculation of the number of active trades for a particular market, and is used as an indicator whether trading is becoming more or less active.)

Gensler’s answer, enshrined in draft legislation currently before Congress, is to make trades more visible by requiring all over-the-counter derivatives to trade through an approved clearing house. While the thrust of new legislation is to get a better handle on financial derivatives such as credit default swaps, it will give regulators a better picture of all derivatives trading, including energy contracts.

At the same time, the CFTC and the Securities and Exchange Commission both are beefing up their ability to monitor hedge fund activity. The SEC for the first time will require hedge funds to register as investment advisors, and Gensler has pledged closer oversight of the funds that it supervises as commodity pool operators.

The industry, predictably, is pushing back. In congressional testimony on the new legislation, the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, the largest futures exchange in the world, and other exchange operators presented studies based on CFTC data to show that large positions held by index funds and other managed money were not “routinely detrimental” to the commodity markets in the period January 2005 to June 2008.

“All of the trader groups displayed instances of non-optimal behavior (including small traders), but none were consistently harmful to the studied markets,” they said. A task force of the International Organization of Securities Regulators (IOSCO) released a report last March that came to a similar conclusion.

“While reports reviewed by the task force concluded that fundamentals rather than speculative activity was the plausible explanation for price changes, the task force has made a number of recommendations to improve the transparency and supervision of these markets,” IOSCO said.

These included suggestions regarding information about the underlying commodities, access to and sharing of information about trading positions, beefing up enforcement powers, and improving global coordination.

The spectacular collapse of the Amaranth Advisors hedge fund in 2006 when it lost $6 billion on natural gas futures did pull back the veil on hedge fund activity in energy markets. Amaranth built up its huge position in natural gas futures through OTC contracts that exactly mirrored the contracts on the New York Mercantile Exchange but remained hidden from regulators, who were unable to enforce position limits designed to rein in speculative trading.

In hearings about Amaranth before various House and Senate committees as well as at the CFTC itself, it became clear, at least to many lawmakers, that contracts on unregulated trading venues can influence prices.

The case was so straightforward that it prompted the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to flex its new post-Enron mandate to stop manipulation of energy prices by pursuing disciplinary action against Amaranth.

This led to a turf war with the CFTC, which claimed exclusive jurisdiction over futures trading and argued that FERC’s mandate extended only to spot trading. FERC countered that when activity in the futures market affected spot prices, it was authorized to act.

Those proceedings ended in a joint settlement last August, before either CFTC or FERC held their administrative hearings and before an appellate court could decide the jurisdictional issue.

But the Amaranth case remains as a reminder of what a hedge fund can do in energy markets if these trades are not more transparent. Legislation bringing more visibility to the market and strengthening the hand of regulators will ensure that hedge fund activity in the energy markets will be more closely monitored and limited.

This article was written by Darrell Delamaide for OilPrice.com who focus on Fossil Fuels, Alternative Energy, Metals, Oil Prices and Geopolitics. To find out more visit their website at: http://www.oilprice.com.

Fairholme's Bruce Berkowitz Likes Healthcare Plays

We haven't covered Bruce Berkowitz on Market Folly before since we primarily track hedge funds here. However, there's no reason we shouldn't track him seeing how he is smart, an excellent stockpicker, and runs a concentrated portfolio. For those of you unfamiliar, Berkowitz runs the Fairholme mutual fund (FAIRX).

A $10,000 investment in his fund back in 1999 would today be worth almost $33,000. He founded Fairholme back in 1997 after a career as a managing director for Smith Barney. His Fairholme portfolio typically holds only 15-25 stocks, 20% cash, and employs a value approach. Berkowitz likes to see solid management teams coupled with undervalued companies. His concentrated portfolio allows him to 'bet big' on the stocks he sniffs out.

With this in mind, let's check out his latest focus: healthcare reform. In a recent publication from Money magazine, Berkowitz said he thinks the market is overestimating the impact that Obama's plans will have on healthcare companies. In fact, Berkowitz likes healthcare plays so much that he's put around 25% of Fairholme's portfolio in these sorts of companies. He doesn't think that healthcare reform will hurt profits for drug and hospital companies as much as others anticipate.

So, what companies does Berkowitz like? Here are his picks:

Humana (HUM) and WellPoint (WLP)

With both companies possessing P/E ratios of less than 10, they certainly fit Fairholme's undervalued focus. Berkowitz says that, "these insurers are both generating a significant amount of cash, and that's not reflected in their low stock prices. We don't believe the government will take over providing health insurance, despite fears otherwise."

Pfizer (PFE) and Forest Laboratories (FRX)

These companies also sport low P/E ratios and Berkowitz has taken notice. He says that, "a decade ago people overpaid for drug stocks because they were overly optimistic about earnings potential. Today that pendulum has swung so far the other way that some stocks are priced below their true value." Shares of Pfizer have been marching higher in stair-stepping fashion and trade at much lower multiples than they have historically.

We make special note of PFE because we've noticed many hedge funds buying shares over the past few quarters. After all, Pfizer was the second most popular stock held by hedge funds. Berkowitz is certainly not alone in his fondness for this name. John Griffin's hedge fund Blue Ridge Capital had Pfizer as their third largest US equity holding when last we checked. Whitney Tilson's hedge fund T2 Partners is long PFE. Also, David Einhorn's Greenlight Capital also has a sizable stake in Pfizer and has been bullish on their prospects. While shares have been marching higher, we'll have to see if they continue to do so given the large 'smart money' presence.

So, some interesting picks from Fairholme's Berkowitz. He certainly feels others have overestimated the impact of healthcare reform on these companies. After all, he has almost a quarter of his portfolio in this sector. Lastly, in other interesting news out of Fairholme, we saw earlier that Berkowitz would be opening a bond fund after enjoying success with his equity fund. We'll continue to track his portfolio going forward.

Technical Analysis Weekly Watchlist

OptionAddict is out with his latest technical analysis weekly watchlist. In the video below, he examines stocks you should buy on the dips as well as those you should sell on the rips. He outlines breakouts, breakdowns, and various technical analysis patterns on the charts. If you're looking for a trading opportunity in the near-term (swing trading), here's an excellent list for you.

Email readers come to the blog to watch the video:

Reader Poll: We Need Your Feedback!

Readers, we need your help! We want to make MarketFolly.com more enjoyable for you and so we have two quick poll questions we'd love you to share your thoughts on. We want you to tell us what content YOU want to see here on Market Folly. RSS & Email readers: if the polls do not show up for you, please come to the site to vote. Thanks very much for your help!

The first question: What do you want to see more of on Market Folly?




And secondly, if you don't mind us asking anonymously, how are you involved in the markets?




With your help we can deliver more of the content you desire. Again, our sincere thanks for your participation.

PIMCO's Bill Gross: January Outlook

Earlier this morning, we had a guest post that highlighted Bill Gross' simple explanation as to why the market is up so much from the lows. Now, we're shifting our focus to Bill Gross' monthly outlook. In his January 2010 note entitled 'Let's Get Fisical", the PIMCO bond vigilante delves into fiscal affairs. Here are some of his thoughts:

"Explaining the current state of global fiscal affairs is often confusing – it’s much like Robert Palmer’s 1980s classic song where he laments that “She’s so fine, there’s no telling where the money went!” Where government spending has gone is not always clear, but one thing is certain: public debt is soaring and most of it has come from G7 countries intent on stimulating their respective economies. Over the past two years their sovereign debt has climbed by roughly 20% of respective GDPs, yet that is not the full story. Some of governments’ mystery money showed up in sovereign budgets funded by debt sold to investors, but more of it showed up on central bank balance sheets as a result of check writing that required no money at all. The latter was 2009’s global innovation known as “quantitative easing,” where central banks and fiscal agents bought Treasuries, Gilts, and Euroland corporate “covered” bonds approaching two trillion dollars. It was the least understood, most surreptitious government bailout of all, far exceeding the U.S. TARP in magnitude. In the process, as shown in Chart 1, the Fed and the Bank of England (BOE) alone expanded their balance sheets (bought and guaranteed bonds) up to depressionary 1930s levels of nearly 20% of GDP. Theoretically, this could go on for some time, but the check writing is ultimately inflationary and central bankers don’t like to get saddled with collateral such as 30-year mortgages that reduce their maneuverability and represent potential maturity mismatches if interest rates go up. So if something can’t keep going, it stops – to paraphrase Herbert Stein – and 2010 will likely witness an attempted exit by the Fed at the end of March, and perhaps even the BOE later in the year.

Here’s the problem that the U.S. Fed’s “exit” poses in simple English: Our fiscal 2009 deficit totaled nearly 12% of GDP and required over $1.5 trillion of new debt to finance it. The Chinese bought a little ($100 billion) of that, other sovereign wealth funds bought some more, but as shown in Chart 2, foreign investors as a group bought only 20% of the total – perhaps $300 billion or so. The balance over the past 12 months was substantially purchased by the Federal Reserve. Of course they purchased more 30-year Agency mortgages than Treasuries, but PIMCO and others sold them those mortgages and bought – you guessed it – Treasuries with the proceeds. The conclusion of this fairytale is that the government got to run up a 1.5 trillion dollar deficit, didn’t have to sell much of it to private investors, and lived happily ever – ever – well, not ever after, but certainly in 2009. Now, however, the Fed tells us that they’re “fed up,” or that they think the economy is strong enough for them to gracefully “exit,” or that they’re confident that private investors are capable of absorbing the balance. Not likely. Various studies by the IMF, the Fed itself, and one in particular by Thomas Laubach, a former Fed economist, suggest that increases in budget deficits ultimately have interest rate consequences and that those countries with the highest current and projected deficits as a percentage of GDP will suffer the highest increases – perhaps as much as 25 basis points per 1% increase in projected deficits five years forward. If that calculation is anywhere close to reality, investors can guesstimate the potential consequences by using impartial IMF projections for major G7 country deficits as shown in Chart 3.

Using 2007 as a starting point and 2014 as a near-term destination, the IMF numbers show that the U.S., Japan, and U.K. will experience “structural” deficit increases of 4-5% of GDP over that period of time, whereas Germany will move in the other direction. Germany, in fact, has just passed a constitutional amendment mandating budget balance by 2016. If these trends persist, the simple conclusion is that interest rates will rise on a relative basis in the U.S., U.K., and Japan compared to Germany over the next several years and that the increase could approximate 100 basis points or more. Some of those increases may already have started to show up – the last few months alone have witnessed 50 basis points of differential between German Bunds and U.S. Treasuries/U.K. Gilts, but there is likely more to come.

The fact is that investors, much like national citizens, need to be vigilant and there has been a decided lack of vigilance in recent years from both camps in the U.S. While we may not have much of a vote between political parties, in the investment world we do have a choice of airlines and some of those national planes may have elevated their bond and other asset markets on the wings of central bank check writing over the past 12 months. Downdrafts and discipline lie ahead for governments and investor portfolios alike. While my own Pollyannish advocacy of “check-free” elections may be quixotic, the shifting of private investment dollars to more fiscally responsible government bond markets may make for a very real outcome in 2010 and beyond. Additionally, if exit strategies proceed as planned, all U.S. and U.K. asset markets may suffer from the absence of the near $2 trillion of government checks written in 2009. It seems no coincidence that stocks, high yield bonds, and other risk assets have thrived since early March, just as this “juice” was being squeezed into financial markets. If so, then most “carry” trades in credit, duration, and currency space may be at risk in the first half of 2010 as the markets readjust to the absence of their “sugar daddy.” There’s no tellin’ where the money went? Not exactly, but it’s left a suspicious trail. Market returns may not be “so fine” in 2010.

William Gross
Managing Director"

You can download Bill Gross' January outlook via .pdf here. So, it seems the focus is now on exit strategies as the Fed *will* have to exit at some point and Gross has shifted to a more cautious approach. This stems from his earlier thoughts on why the market is up so much from the lows. The government has been feeding the markets, and eventually the hand that feeds will disappear.

As we posted on Twitter a while back, "PIMCO's Total Return fund essentially IS the bond market now, $186 billion AUM in Bill Gross' fund now; insane." So, at the very least, it's worth noting his thoughts and what he's up to. We pointed out a while back that Gross was betting on deflation by buying long-term treasuries. Also, we had posted Gross' December outlook as well for those who missed it. Interesting stuff and we'll continue to cover the bond vigilante's thoughts each month.

Raymond James' Jeff Saut: Lessons Learned

Our apologies for not posting this up earlier in the week, but here's the latest weekly commentary from Raymond James' chief investment strategist Jeff Saut. Last week, Saut was out focusing on his 2010 market outlook. This week he takes a look back and focuses on lessons learned in 2009 and notably focuses on thoughts from ex-Merrill Lynch strategists David Rosenberg and Richard Bernstein.

Embedded below is Jeff Saut's weekly investment strategy entitled 'Lessons':



You can download the .pdf here.

For more insight from Jeff Saut, check out his 2010 market outlook. For more research from Raymond James, check out their analysts' best stock picks for 2010.

Why The Stock Market Is Up Over 70% From Its March 2009 Low

The following is a guest post from FirstAdopter.com, a site covering investing and consumer technology news:

-----

There’s a lot of conspiracy theories out there about how the government is manipulating the stock market upwards (I’m looking at you Zero Hedge) by buying stock futures, etc. However a light bulb went off in my head after I read this Time magazine interview with Pimco’s Bill Gross on how simple the explanation is.

But secondly, there’s a ripple affect. Just speaking about Pimco’s general portfolio strategy, we’ve sold our agency mortgage securities, Fannie and Freddie, in the billions to the willing check of the Fed. They’re buying a trillion dollars of them, or have over the past 9-12 months, and so we sold them a lot of ours. Now, what did we do with the money? We bought Treasuries, we bought corporate bonds, and so the bond markets in general have benefited, as have stocks because this available money effectively flows through the capital markets. So it’s a trillion-and-a-half dollar check that won’t be there as the Fed withdraws from the market. How that affects the markets, I just don’t know. I’m not eagerly anticipating the answer, but I think it holds some surprises in 2010, not just in mortgage securities but stocks as well.

So basically Bill Gross, the largest fund manager in the world, explains it to us. The Fed has been buying $1.5 trillion worth of securities from financial firms at unnatural supply/demand and some would say inflated prices, who then use this big pile of money they get from selling to the Fed to buy other stuff like corporate bonds and stocks. This is $1.5 trillion that did not exist before. It is printed money that is flowing through the financial capital markets lifting all boats. A simple explanation for the markets’ rise.

To prove this let’s look at the timing of Fed mortgage backed security buy program announcements. In 2008 the SP500 bottomed on November 21st, 2008. I remember things being very scary then. The Fed then announced their first $500 billion mortgage backed security (MBS) buy program on November 25th, 2008 (Link). The market then rallied 25%+ off the low and topped on January 6th, 2009.

The market then tanked again and bottomed on March 6th, 2009. I remember things being even scarier then. The Fed decided to add $750 billion to the MBS buy program to the original $500 billion and $300 billion of long-term Treasuries for a total over $1.5 trillion of buying power on March 18th, 2009 (Link). In time this $1.5 trillion of printed money worked its way through the system, hence the amazing 70%+ rally.

The lesson is the next time the Fed announces another $500 billion+ capital markets buy program buy the market hand-over-fist, although I doubt this will happen anytime soon given the political climate. And the $1.5 trillion of securities that the Fed bought? Here’s what Bill Gross says about that.

They won’t sell — it’s a near impossibility to unload what they’ve purchased over the past 12 months.

-----


The above was a guest post from FirstAdopter.com.

What We're Reading ~ 1/8/10

Goldman Sachs fund buys stake in hedge fund Shumway Capital Partners [FINalternatives]

We recently covered Shumway's portfolio here [Market Folly]

The ultimate guide to 2010 outlooks & predictions [Pragmatic Capitalist]

Moore Capital hires Brevan Howard founding partner [Bloomberg]

Galleon Group's Rajaratnam paid $1.75 million for tips [Reuters]

BlueCrest's Platt turns grandma's advice into hedge fund gold [Bloomberg]

Free hedge fund career webinar [Richard Wilson]

Hedge Fund Harbinger Capital Reveals Three New Positions

Recently, Philip Falcone's hedge fund firm Harbinger Capital Partners made a series of disclosures that unveiled three new portfolio positions. Firstly, in a 13G filed with the SEC, Harbinger Capital Partners has disclosed a brand new position in Superior Well Services (SWSI). The filing was made due to activity on December 24th, 2009 and they now have a 5.6% ownership stake in the company with 1,714,300 shares. These new portfolio disclosures come right after we saw Harbinger unload shares of Calpine (CPN) and adjust two other positions.

Secondly, Harbinger has also filed a 13G with the SEC in regards to shares of Strategic Hotels & Resorts (BEE). The disclosure was made due to activity on December 24th, 2009 and they have a 5.6% ownership stake with 4,205,000 shares. This is yet another brand new position as they previously did not own any shares as per their SEC filings.

Lastly, we also see that Harbinger has been active in international markets. On the 21st of December 2009, the London Stock Market news service reported that Harbinger Capital held an interest of 90,909,091 ordinary shares of Sable Mining Africa Limited (AIM: SBLM) or 15.1% of the issued share capital and voting rights of the Company. Sable is a brand new holding for Harbinger and in the past we've detailed the rest of Harbinger's UK positions as well. If you're unfamiliar with our new series of tracking hedge fund positions in UK markets, we posted a preface here.

Sable Mining Africa Ltd is a small company listed on the AIM market in London. The company was re-named in November and used to be called BioEnergy Africa. It has seen a fundamental change in strategy over the last few months with a move away from bio-ethanol related assets into mining related energy assets. Sable Mining is now focused on the acquisition or investment in early stage coal and uranium assets or businesses, with a particular emphasis on Namibia, Botswana, Zimbabwe and Zambia. The company intends to be an active investor in an attempt to add value both operationally and strategically to the businesses it acquires or invests in. The company’s objective is to own entire or majority interests in suitable businesses or assets rather than holding minority investments. To facilitate the new strategy, the company undertook a fundraising, via a placement of new ordinary shares in December 2009. It is likely that Harbinger bought their shares in the placement at a price below the quoted market share price. (For cricket enthusiasts: the Chairman of Sable is ex-England slow left arm bowler, Phil Edmonds).

Taken from Google Finance, Superior Well Services "provides a range of wellsite solutions to oil and natural gas companies, primarily technical pumping services and down-hole surveying services. Technical services include technical pumping, down-hole surveying and completion, production and rental tool services. Fluid logistics services include those services related to the transportation, storage and disposal of fluids that are used in the drilling, development and production of hydrocarbons."

Strategic Hotels & Resorts "operates as a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust (REIT). SHR owns and asset manages upper upscale and luxury hotels that are subject to long-term management contracts. The Company conducts its operations through its direct and indirect subsidiaries, including Strategic Hotel Funding, L.L.C (SH Funding). The Company’s existing hotels are operated under brands of Fairmont, Four Seasons, Hyatt, InterContinental, Loews, Marriott, Ritz-Carlton and Westin."

For other recent maneuvers out of Falcone's hedge fund, head to our post on Harbinger's portfolio adjustments.

Roberto Mignone's Hedge Fund Bridger Management Added Tons Of Long Exposure In Q3

This is the third quarter 2009 edition of our hedge fund portfolio tracking series. If you're unfamiliar with tracking hedge fund movements or SEC filings, check out our series preface on hedge fund 13F filings.

This is the first time we've covered Bridger Management in our 13F analysis series. Bridger Management is the hedge fund firm founded by Roberto Mignone in 2000. They currently have around $4 billion in assets under management and run a long/short equity and event driven strategy focused on intensive fundamental research. Before Bridger, Mignone co-founded Blue Ridge Capital with John Griffin in 1996. And before that, Mignone (like Griffin) worked at Julian Robertson's Tiger Management and as such joins the ranks of other prominent 'Tiger Cub' hedge funds. Mignone received his degree from Harvard and his MBA from Harvard Business School. Our only previous coverage of Bridger includes their position in Cardiome Pharma (CRME).

Keep in mind that the positions listed below were Bridger's long equity, note, and options holdings as of September 30th, 2009 as filed with the SEC. We don't cover every single portfolio maneuver, as we instead focus on all the big moves. All holdings are common stock unless otherwise denoted.


Some New Positions
Brand new positions that they initiated last quarter:
Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)
Waste Connections (WCN)
Carmax (KMX)
Apple (AAPL)
Exxon Mobil (XOM)
International Game Technology (IGT)
Royal Caribbean (RCL)
Intel (INTC)
Invesco (IVZ)
Amgen (AMGN)
Microsoft (MSFT)
Immucor (BLUD)
Copart (CPRT)
Boston Scientific (BSX)
Pall (PLL)
Continental Airlines (CAL)
Ebay (EBAY)
Republic Services (RSG)
Watson Pharmaceuticals (WPI)
Biogen Idec (BIIB)
Penn National Gaming (PENN)
Cablevision (CVC)
US Airways (LCC)
Cardinal Health (CAH)
Monsanto (MON)
Pennymac Mortgage (PMT) ~ This is interesting because fellow hedge fund Blue Ridge Capital (Mignone's former fund) also has a position.
Las Vegas Sands (LVS)


Some Increased Positions
Positions they already owned but added shares to:
UnitedHealth (UNH): Increased position by 419.6%
Bally Technologies (BYI): Increased by 322.2%
Millipore (MIL): Increased by 158.7%
OSI Pharmaceuticals (OSIP): Increased by 100%
Hertz Global (HTZ): Increased by 77.7%
First America (FAF): Increased by 64.7%
Davita (DVA): Increased by 30%


Some Reduced Positions
Stakes they sold shares in but still own:
Schering Plough (SGP): Reduced position by 58.2%
Life Technologies (LIFE): Reduced by 32.3%
MGM Mirage (MGM): Reduced by 27.6%


Removed Positions
Positions they sold out of completely:
Zimmer Holdings (ZMH)
Sysco (SYY)
Staples (SPLS)
Bank of America (BAC)
Transocean (RIG)
Conoco Phillips (COP)
Cisco Systems (CSCO)
Plains Exploration (PXP)
Arch Coal (ACI)
Host Hotels (HST)
Liveperson (LPSN)
Waters (WAT)
Olin (OLN)
Tyson Foods (TSN)


Top 15 Holdings by percentage of assets reported on 13F filing

1. Covidien (COV): 3.81%
2. Millipore (MIL): 3.25%
3. Expedia (EXPE): 3.04%
4. Dr Pepper Snapple (DPS): 2.94%
5. Ameriprise Financial (AMP): 2.59%
6. Wyeth (WYE): 2.53%
7. Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A): 2.31%
8. First America Corp (FAF): 2.16%
9. Waste Connections (WCN): 2.05%
10. Carmax (KMX): 1.99%
11. Apple (AAPL): 1.99%
12. Ritchie Bros Auction (RBA): 1.97%
13. Exxon Mobil (XOM): 1.96%
14. Avis Budget (CAR): 1.91%
15. International Game Technology (IGT): 1.84%
    

Hedge fund Bridger Management was out adding a ton of brand new positions in the third quarter. After all, their assets invested in long US equities increased by almost $1 billion. Literally six of their top 15 holdings were brand new stakes including Berkshire Hathaway, Waste Connections, Carmax, Apple, Exxon Mobil, and International Game Technology. This fits directly with the theme we've seen of hedge funds being very long equities.

Bridger also added heavily to existing positions in UnitedHealth, Bally Technologies, and Millipore. We want to single out Millipore because Mignone's old firm, Blue Ridge Capital also has held a position in MIL for quite some time. It's interesting to see the portfolio overlap between Bridger and Blue Ridge, as well as other funds. Of all the Tiger Cub hedge funds, we'd venture to say that Bridger has one of the more individualistic portfolios in terms of top holdings. Don't get us wrong, they still share similar positions with other Tiger Cub hedge funds, but unlike those funds, Bridger does not hold them as top positions. Check out Blue Ridge's portfolio to see the similarities and differences. In terms of names Mignone's hedge fund sold completely out of, Zimmer Holdings, Sysco, Staples, and Bank of America no longer grace their portfolio and had previously been sizable positions.

Below you'll find graphical representations of the recent shifts in Bridger Management's portfolio courtesy of Drew Robertson at Financial Research Station:

(click to enlarge)

(click to enlarge)

Overall, they increased stakes in services and technology. Assets from the collective holdings reported to the SEC via 13F filing were $2.1 billion this quarter compared to $1.15 billion last quarter, so they almost doubled their long US equity exposure on a quarter over quarter basis. Please keep in mind that when we state "percentage of portfolio," we are referring to the percentage of assets reported on the 13F filing. Since these filings only report longs (and not shorts or cash positions), the percentages are skewed. Also, please again note that these positions were as of September 30th so two months have elapsed and they've undoubtedly shifted around their portfolio since then.

This is just one of the 40+ prominent funds that we'll be covering in our Q3 2009 hedge fund portfolio series. We've already covered Seth Klarman's Baupost Group Bill Ackman's Pershing Square, Stephen Mandel's Lone Pine Capital, Dan Loeb's Third Point LLC, David Einhorn's Greenlight Capital, John Paulson's firm Paulson & Co, Lee Ainslie's Maverick Capital, Andreas Halvorsen's Viking Global, Chase Coleman's Tiger Global, Brett Barakett's Tremblant Capital, John Griffin's Blue Ridge Capital and Shumway Capital Partners (Chris Shumway), Thomas Steyer's Farallon Capital, David Stemerman's Conatus Capital, and Matt Iorio's White Elm Capital. Check back daily as we'll be covering new hedge fund portfolios.

Matt Iorio's Hedge Fund White Elm Capital: A Portfolio Glance

This is the third quarter 2009 edition of our hedge fund portfolio tracking series. If you're unfamiliar with tracking hedge fund movements or SEC filings, check out our series preface on hedge fund 13F filings.

For the first time in our series we'll be tracking Matt Iorio's White Elm Capital. Previously, Iorio had spent six years at Stephen Mandel's Lone Pine Capital. Prior to that, Iorio graduated from the University of Virginia (McIntire School of Commerce) in 1993 and then went on to receive his MBA from Dartmouth's Tuck School of Business. After leaving Mandel's fund, he started his own hedge fund and we are tracking him due to his contributions to Lone Pine's success in the past. White Elm uses a long/short strategy with the goal of outperforming the market indices with less risk. They employ a fundamental, bottom-up investment process focused on company specific research, very similar to the process employed at Lone Pine (Stephen Mandel) and before that at Tiger Management (Julian Robertson).

Upon launching with $250 million last year, Iorio was said to be aiming for 'slow and steady' growth rather than ballooning his assets under management (AUM) as he targets fewer investors. And, there are many benefits to this approach as it has been well documented that smaller firms often outperform their larger counterparts. As funds grow and reach $1 billion and higher, their scope of potential investments often narrows since they have to put a lot of money to work. Smaller funds can be more nimble and can move in and out of whatever they please. Since White Elm is a newer fund, this is only their fourth 13F filing and we'll examine their portfolio holdings from the third quarter of 2009.

Below were their long equity, note, and options holdings as of September 30th, 2009 as filed with the SEC. We don't cover every single portfolio maneuver, as we instead focus on all the big moves. All holdings are common stock unless otherwise denoted.


Some New Positions
Brand new positions that they initiated last quarter:
Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB)
Vistaprint (VPRT)
SBA Communications (SBAC)
Denbury Resources (DNR)
Umpqua Holdings (UMPQ)
Harley Davidson (HOG) Puts
Martin Marietta (MLM)
Longtop Financial (LFT)
Pitney Bowes (PBI) Puts
ETrade Financial (ETFC)
Dolby Laboratories (DLB)
Green Mountain Coffee Roasters (GMCR)
XL Capital (XL)


Some Increased Positions
Positions they already owned but added shares to:
American Public Education (APEI): Increased position by 570.5%
American Express (AXP): Increased by 349.2%
Atwood Oceanics (ATW): Increased by 87.2%
JPMorgan Chase (JPM): Increased by 66.4%
Apple (AAPL): Increased by 64.7%
Pinnacle Entertainment (PNK): Increased by 54.4%
Monsanto (MON): Increased by 39.5%
SEI Investments (SEIC): Increased by 24.1%


Some Reduced Positions
Stakes they sold shares in but still own:
Eastman Kodak (EK) Puts: Reduced position by 80.5%
Priceline (PCLN): Reduced by 70.7%
Google (GOOG): Reduced by 66.1%
Brink Home Security (CFL): Reduced by 41.7%
Collective Brands (PSS): Reduced by 30.1%
RenaissanceRe (RNR): Reduced by 25.3%
Visa (V): Reduced by 22.4%


Removed Positions
Positions they sold out of completely:
Qualcomm (QCOM)
Lorillard (LO)
MetroPCS (PCS)
Transocean (RIG)
State Street (STT)
Riskmetrics (RMG)
Progressive (PGR)
Principal Financial (PFG)


Top 15 Holdings by percentage of assets reported on 13F filing

1. CNInsure (CISG): 8.13%
2. Apple (AAPL): 7.18%
3. Crown Castle (CCI): 5.98%
4. JPMorgan Chase (JPM): 5.15%
5. Solera Holdings (SLH): 5.12%
6. Atwood Oceanics (ATW): 4.99%
7. American Express (AXP): 4.81%
8. Visa (V): 4.15%
9. Collective Brands (PSS): 3.86%
10. Mastercard (MA): 3.59%
11. Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB): 3.55%
12. Goldman Sachs (GS): 3.41%
13. Transdigm (TDG): 3.21%
14. Vistaprint (VPRT): 2.92%
15. National Oilwell Varco (NOV): 2.66%
    

White Elm Capital started brand new positions in Fifth Third Bancorp and Vistaprint (VPRT). We want to single out their VPRT stake because Matt Iorio's former employer Lone Pine Capital also has a large Vistaprint stake. White Elm also added significantly to their existing positions in American Public Education and American Express. Like many other hedge funds, Apple (AAPL) is one of White Elm's largest holdings.

The cellular tower theme is prominent amongst Tiger Cub hedge funds and White Elm has selected Crown Castle (CCI) as their play. Many other funds own competitor American Tower (AMT) so it's interesting to see more funds owning CCI. Sticking with the 'positions owned by Tiger Cubs' theme, we also see that Iorio's hedge fund owns the payment processors of Mastercard and Visa as well.

Interestingly enough, we could also be getting a glimpse at some of their short positions as they have isolated put options on the following names: Harley Davidson, Garmin, Pitney Bowes, and Eastman Kodak. Since they don't own long stock in any of these names, they could be using put options as their proxy to short these companies.

Lastly, White Elm sold completely out of some previously large positions for them, including Qualcomm, Lorillard, and MetroPCS. Their sale of Qualcomm is notable since this company is one of the most popular stocks held by hedge funds.

Below you'll find graphical representations of the recent shifts in White Elm Capital's portfolio courtesy of Drew Robertson at Financial Research Station:

(click to enlarge)

(click to enlarge)

Iorio's hedge fund was adding to their holdings in the financial sectors and basic materials. They decreased their technology and consumer goods positions. Assets from the collective holdings reported to the SEC via 13F filing were $227 million this quarter compared to $202 million last quarter. Please keep in mind that when we state "percentage of portfolio," we are referring to the percentage of assets reported on the 13F filing. Since these filings only report longs (and not shorts or cash positions), the percentages are skewed. Also, please again note that these positions were as of September 30th so two months have elapsed and they've undoubtedly shifted around their portfolio since then.

This is just one of the 40+ prominent funds that we'll be covering in our Q3 2009 hedge fund portfolio series. We've already covered Seth Klarman's Baupost Group Bill Ackman's Pershing Square, Stephen Mandel's Lone Pine Capital, Dan Loeb's Third Point LLC, David Einhorn's Greenlight Capital, John Paulson's firm Paulson & Co, Lee Ainslie's Maverick Capital, Andreas Halvorsen's Viking Global, Chase Coleman's Tiger Global, Brett Barakett's Tremblant Capital, John Griffin's Blue Ridge Capital and Shumway Capital Partners (Chris Shumway), Thomas Steyer's Farallon Capital, and David Stemerman's Conatus Capital. Check back daily as we'll be covering new hedge fund portfolios.

David Stemerman's Conatus Capital Added To Tech Holdings, Bought Homebuilders

This is the third quarter 2009 edition of our hedge fund portfolio tracking series. If you're unfamiliar with tracking hedge fund movements or SEC filings, check out our series preface on hedge fund 13F filings.

Next up in our series is David Stemerman's hedge fund Conatus Capital. This is only the fourth time we've covered their portfolio because this is literally only their fourth 13F filing. They are a newer fund, but their manager definitely has experience. Conatus raised $2.3 billion and began trading last year after David Stemerman left Stephen Mandel's Lone Pine Capital to start his own hedge fund.

Conatus is an interesting story to follow because Stemerman's old employer is a prominent 'Tiger Cub' hedge fund. Stephen Mandel was part of the group of Tiger Cubs that left Julian Robertson's successful Tiger Management to start their own hedge funds. Now Mandel has taken on the role of mentor and is seeing former employees going on to start their own funds. Things have come full circle and we're starting to see Tiger GrandCubs. In addition to David Stemerman, Matt Iorio also left Lone Pine to start his own firm, White Elm Capital, who we will track for the first time tomorrow. We find it appropriate to track these two gentlemen because they are well-versed in the successful bottom-up 'Tiger' stockpicking and have contributed to Lone Pine's solid track record over the years. You can check out our previous Conatus portfolio update here. Let's now move onto Conatus' portfolio from the third quarter of 2009.

Keep in mind that the positions listed below were Conatus' long equity, note, and options holdings as of September 30th, 2009 as filed with the SEC. We don't cover every single portfolio maneuver, as we instead focus on all the big moves. All holdings are common stock unless otherwise denoted.


Some New Positions
Brand new positions that they initiated last quarter:
Wells Fargo (WFC)
Weatherford International (WFT)
DR Horton (DHI)
Toll Brothers (TOL)
Monsanto (MON)
Mindray Medical (MR)
Bed Bath & Beyond (BBBY)
Carnival (CCL)
Citrix (CTXS)
Baidu (BIDU)
Freeport McMoran (FCX)
BHP Billiton (BHP)


Some Increased Positions
Positions they already owned but added shares to:
Cisco Systems (CSCO): Increased position by 150.5%
Google (GOOG): Increased by 61.5%
Petrohawk (HK): Increased by 48.4%
SBA Communications (SBAC): Increased by 47.5%
Itau Unibanco (ITUB): Increased by 32.2%
Crown Castle (CCI): Increased by 30.6%
Apollo Group (APOL): Increased by 28.9%
Express Scripts (ESRX): Increased by 17%


Some Reduced Positions
Stakes they sold shares in but still own:
Priceline (PCLN): Reduced position by 42.8%
CTrip (CTRP): Reduced by 37.1%
Teradata (TDC): Reduced by 30.6%
Cognizant Tech (CTSH): Reduced by 25.1%
CH Robinson (CHRW): Reduced by 21.5%
Walter Energy (WLT): Reduced by 20.1%
Amazon (AMZN): Reduced by 14.2%


Removed Positions
Positions they sold out of completely:
Mastercard (MA)
Visa (V)
American Tower (AMT)
Discovery Communications (DISCA)
Southwestern Energy (SWN)


Top 15 Holdings by percentage of assets reported on 13F filing

1. Apple (AAPL): 5.34%
2. Apollo Group (APOL): 4.98%
3. Range Resources (RRC): 4.84%
4. Medco Health (MHS): 4.41%
5. Cisco Systems (CSCO): 4.33%
6. Express Scripts (ESRX): 4.32%
7. Walter Energy (WLT): 3.7%
8. Google (GOOG): 3.63%
9. Wells Fargo (WFC): 3.63%
10. Weatherford International (WFT): 3.53%
11. JPMorgan Chase (JPM): 3.53%
12. Itau Unibanco (ITUB): 3.27%
13. Cognizant Tech (CTSH): 3.08%
14. DR Horton (DHI): 3.05%
15. Toll Brothers (TOL): 3.04%
    

Overall, Conatus increased their holdings in basic materials and decreased their stakes in services. It was very intriguing to see them sell completely out of the payment processing duo of Mastercard and Visa. It is notable because almost almost all of the other Tiger Cub hedge funds own one or both of these stocks and Conatus' sale means they've taken a different path.

In terms of positions they added to, they were fond of technology as they added heavily to their positions in Google and Cisco Systems. Stemerman's hedge fund also started brand new stakes in the home builders (Toll Brothers & DR Horton) which was worth noting given the tough times these companies have faced with the economy. Much like fellow hedge fund John Griffin's Blue Ridge Capital, Conatus also had Apple (AAPL) as their top long US equity holding. Coming in at their #2 holding was their stake in Apollo Group (APOL), another favorite amongst Tiger Cub hedge funds. Conatus' portfolio overall includes three stocks found on the list of most popular stocks amongst hedge funds.

Assets from the collective holdings reported to the SEC via 13F filing were $1.9 billion this quarter compared to $1.2 billion last quarter. So, like many other hedge funds, their long exposure to US equities increased substantially. Please keep in mind that when we state "percentage of portfolio," we are referring to the percentage of assets reported on the 13F filing. Since these filings only report longs (and not shorts or cash positions), the percentages are skewed. Also, please again note that these positions were as of September 30th so two months have elapsed and they've undoubtedly shifted around their portfolio since then.

This is just one of the 40+ prominent funds that we'll be covering in our Q3 2009 hedge fund portfolio series. We've already covered Seth Klarman's Baupost Group Bill Ackman's Pershing Square, Stephen Mandel's Lone Pine Capital, Dan Loeb's Third Point LLC, David Einhorn's Greenlight Capital, John Paulson's firm Paulson & Co, Lee Ainslie's Maverick Capital, Andreas Halvorsen's Viking Global, Chase Coleman's Tiger Global, Brett Barakett's Tremblant Capital, John Griffin's Blue Ridge Capital, Shumway Capital Partners (Chris Shumway) and Thomas Steyer's Farallon Capital. Check back daily as we'll be covering new hedge fund portfolios.

Analysts' Best Stock Picks For 2010

Raymond James' global research is out with a list of their analysts' best stock picks for 2010. Our previous post on this list was taken down due to the list not being distributed to the public yet. So, now that it is available publicly, here is their list. Their picks from this past year (2009) was up 52% compared to an S&P return over the same period of 30.1%, so they've outperformed by a wide margin. In fact, their annual list of stock picks has outperformed the S&P 500 in all year but one since 1996.



Their goal is to identify stocks that will produce "above-average price appreciation" over the course of the next year. They certainly did that with their 2009 list and so let's see if they can do it again with their impending 2010 selections.

Investment theme and stock pick lists for 2010 seem to be popular amongst the various financial institutions right now heading into the new year. Just yesterday, we covered the top ten investment themes for 2010 and how to play them. We've also detailed the top ten stocks held by hedge funds as well. Today we drill it down to specific stock picks for the new year courtesy of Raymond James. As always, take everything with a grain of salt as these reflect their own opinions. Without further ado, here's the list:


Analysts' Best Picks for 2010

1. Aflac (AFL)
2. Alpha Natural Resources (ANR)
3. Altera Corporation (ALTR)
4. Bank of America (BAC)
5. Best Buy (BBY)
6. Chevron (CVX)
7. Concho Resources (CXO)
8. CVS Caremark (CVS)
9. FLIR Systems (FLIR)
10. National Oilwell Varco (NOV)
11. Nuance Communications (NUAN)
12. Sybase (SY)
13. TD Ameritrade (AMTD)
    

Let's dive into some specifics regarding each of their picks:

Aflac (AFL): Raymond James likes Aflac because they feel there is room for growth from supplemental health insurance products. Additionally, they fancy AFL's entrance into the group market. Overall, they feel they will see continued long-term demand. Finally, RJ writes, "Our price target of $60, established on October 29, assumes a normalized P/E on our 2010 EPS expectation of 11.7x less expected investment losses of $2.35 per share. The normalized P/E target is a 20% discount to the then current S&P 500 P/E of 15.6x based on a mean 2010 EPS estimate of $71.17."

Alpha Natural Resources (ANR): Their pick here is based on valuation as well as leverage to the metallurgical coal market, an area that is strengthening. They are also well diversified in other areas and have a solid balance sheet. RJ's main thesis here is valuation based as they write, "Our $52.00 target price factors in our target multiples on the various metrics including 15x P/E ratio, 7.5x P/CF, and 7x EBITDA, which fit within the historical trading ranges of ANR, along with a long-term DCF analysis. Note that this does not include any value for the ~330 Bcf of natural gas reserves, which we believe is easily worth another $5.00 per share, with upside over time through its Marcellus acreage."

Altera (ALTR): Raymond James has selected Altera due to their positioning to capitalize on programmable logic devices (PLDs). They think ALTR will outpace the semiconductor industry in growth by 2x over the course of the next few years. Their analysts write, "ALTR shares remain one of our favorite ideas with a 12-month price target of $29, based on a 23x target P/E multiple to our 2011 EPS estimate of $1.25. This multiple is a slight premium to the shares' 21x historic P/E average over the last three years, which we believe is conservative given Altera's solid business model and leadership in the industry."

Bank of America (BAC): Their tagline on this stock is simply "superior upside potential." As we have covered previously, numerous hedge funds agree as BAC is one of the most popular stocks amongst hedge funds. Analysts at Raymond James feel an oligopoly has emerged in US banking and BAC is right up there with the best in risk-based pricing as they write, "Trading at only 69% of book value and 131% of tangible book value compared to the recent industry averages of 114% and 164%, respectively, shares of BAC offer attractive risk/reward pricing and compare favorably to large-cap peers. Bank of America has already received approval to pay back its $45 billion in TARP funds and we believe a CEO announcement is imminent, both of which should receive a favorable response from the Street."

Best Buy (BBY): RJ's analytical team feels Best Buy can continue to capitalize on the demise of Circuit City as they will continue to gobble up market share, expanding returns. Improving operating margins and an increasing consumer base is boosting BBY's performance and they feel management is one of the best in consumer electronics. RJ writes, "Our $52 price target was reached by placing a ~15x multiple on our FY11 EPS estimate of $3.45, which represents a 16.7% discount to its historical three-year average of 18x."

Chevron (CVX): Chevron is the 'best positioned' among the integrated oil plays, RJ says. This is due to their above average oil focus, their drill-bit track record as they have the highest resource replacement rate, and lastly their small refining segment which should benefit them as they feel those with large exposure to refining will suffer going forward. Raymond James' analysts write, "Quite simply, we believe Chevron should be a core long-term holding for energy investors. Our $92.00 target price is based on ~11.6x our 2010 EPS estimate of $7.92, a slight discount to the mean 2000-2009 P/E. Inclusive of the current 3.5% dividend yield, our target price implies total return potential of 18%."

Concho Resources (CXO): Their pick here is mainly due to high returns in the Permian Basin as the vast majority of their revenues are tied to the price of oil. Of CXO, RJ's analysts say, "Concho generates some of the highest cash margins in our E&P group. One of the company’s core plays, the Yeso, generates an 80% internal rate of return at $70/Bbl oil. Concho is also one of the best in the entire E&P universe on production growth per debt-adjusted share (~35% vs. 3% for the peer group)."

CVS Caremark (CVS): This selection is based on the fact that CVS's model is not broken and that valuation is still attractive. They argue that the worst is behind this name and that going forward retail tailwinds will be behind them and they will see improvements in their Long's acquisition. Raymond James analysts argue that CVS now has compelling relative valuation and that you could potentially be getting their PBM essentially for free. They write, "With expectations reset, the potential for an improved 2011 selling season, and continued share gains in retail, we believe shares are poised to expand off of these trough valuation levels, especially if management continues to deploy significant levels of FCF to share repurchases. Our $39 price target represents 13x 2011 EPS of $2.95, toward the low end of historic ranges." Back on November 5th on our Twitter account we actually mentioned that Lee Ainslie (hedge fund manager of Maverick Capital) was supposedly very keen on shares of CVS at an investment conference that took place before the recent disappointment. We'll have to see if he still favors it going forward.

FLIR Systems (FLIR): Their bullishness on FLIR is attributed to rising orders and what they deem to be attractive valuation. FLIR is a pure play on thermal imaging and infrared technology, an area with lots of growth potential. They write, "As time progresses through next year and investors value FLIR on 2011 earnings, we believe the stock can reach the $40.00 range as its multiple expands toward the historical average. Our $35.00 target price is a 23x multiple on our 2010 EPS estimate of $1.50, in-line with the firm’s historical average multiple and in-line with peers."

National Oilwell Varco (NOV): This has previously been a hedge fund favorite and now Raymond James feel it will benefit throughout 2010. Their rationale: compelling valuation, free cash flow that is strong, and inorganic growth opportunities. They simply feel this is the best name in the oil service space by writing, "Our target price of $60.00 is based on ~18.5x our 2010 EPS. This valuation is in-line with its oilfield manufacturing peers and represents a more reasonable valuation for the company given its tremendous cash position, decent yield, and excellent growth prospects."

Nuance Communications (NUAN): Raymond James feels that speech recognition will be a forcible trend in technology and that Nuance is how you can play it. NUAN is already well positioned in a market that is just now entering the mainstream. Their analysts feel that, "Catalysts for the stock could include: gradual improvement in on-premise enterprise sales and resurgence in enterprise speech growth rates to 10+%, continued large on-demand wins within healthcare, potential benefits from the healthcare stimulus for Dragon Medical, continued new handset and auto wins for mobile, large hosted mobile care wins, and strong cash flow generation."

Sybase (SY): Their analytical team has decided that Sybase actually makes sense in any market environment. However, they have picked it for their 2010 list because it is a recession-resilient business and that they can capitalize on secular growth. RJ says, "Our $49 price target is based on a forward P/E multiple of 19x our 2010 EPS estimate of $2.58. We believe this is justified due to continued license growth, an improving operating margin, and the belief that we will continue to increase our EPS estimates."

TD Ameritrade (AMTD): Rounding out their list of selections, TD Ameritrade makes the cut due to possible catalysts, a solid balance sheet, as well as possible earnings growth should the Fed raise rates during the next year. RJ's analysts write, "TD Ameritrade remains at a discount to peer Charles Schwab (SCHW/$17.88/Outperform), which is currently trading at 21x our 2010 EPS estimate of $0.84 and 14x our 2011 EPS estimate of $1.29."

So there you have it. A few peculiar insertions but some logical ones as well. We'll have to see if their list can outperform the S&P500 yet again this coming year. We've also covered some other research out of Raymond James as we detail their chief investment strategist Jeff Saut's weekly market commentary. You can check out his stock market commentary from this week, as well as his previous market commentary where he feels a weak dollar will drive further market upside.

Comparing their list to the top stocks held by hedge funds, we see very little overlap. However, one stock where they both resoundingly agree is Bank of America (BAC). Tons of hedge funds hold this name and Raymond James has labeled it one of their top picks. For more favored stock picks for the year 2010, check out the top ten investment themes for 2010 as well as the most popular stocks among hedge funds.